To: Liz
Hmmmm? According to Rush this morning - there was a worker from S&S who said there was no way they had printed 1 mil books - the reason was because they had no place to store it. Also ... according to same worker ... the story of 200,000 the first day was a calculation they could not possibly be able to make and they didn't know where the number came from ...?? Geeeeeee! I bet I can take a wild guess and get it correct ...??
49 posted on
06/16/2003 12:25:02 PM PDT by
CyberAnt
( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
To: All
Thought you all would find this interesting ...
According to Rush this morning - there was a worker from S&S who said there was no way they had printed 1 mil books - the reason was because they had no place to store it. Also ... according to same worker ... the story of 200,000 the first day was a calculation they could not possibly be able to make and they didn't know where the number came from ...?? Geeeeeee! I bet I can take a wild guess and get it correct ...??
51 posted on
06/16/2003 12:30:17 PM PDT by
CyberAnt
( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
To: CyberAnt; SFConservative; Labyrinthos; TomGuy; BOBTHENAILER
She won't be laughing for long if Simon & Schuster can't prove to the shareholders that
their sales figures were booked properly. And where did S&S book the $8M outlay?
53 posted on
06/16/2003 1:41:58 PM PDT by
Liz
To: CyberAnt
Hmmmm? According to Rush this morning - there was a worker from S&S who said there was no way they had printed 1 mil books - the reason was because they had no place to store it. Also ... according to same worker ... the story of 200,000 the first day was a calculation they could not possibly be able to make and they didn't know where the number came from ...?? O'Reilly really needs to interview a S&S exec on his show.
57 posted on
06/16/2003 4:48:33 PM PDT by
PJ-Comix
(He Who Laughs Last Was Too Dumb To Figure out the Joke First)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson