Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mortimer Snavely; RLK; Luis Gonzalez; Dog Gone; RJayneJ; JohnHuang2; Nick Danger; section9; ...
"It must be understood there absolutely is no such thing as a moderate or center position in politics where there is a radical left. Any time your candidate moves half way to accommodate or make peace with the left, the left responds by moving farther left, which then moves the middle point farther left. Consequently, in the last 40 years moderation and middle ground have been moving targets receding leftward at the speed of light as so-called moderates and peacemakers desperately and lamely pursue the endlessly moving average set and reset by ever-increasing radicalism and pathology on the left. The shift has been such that the leftist position of 40 years ago is now called right-wing extremism."

RLK made some good points up until this last paragraph.

40 years ago the far Left was represented by hardcore Black Panthers, hardly the meager Left of today.

40 years ago the Left wanted the U.S. out of all wars, hardly Lieberman's position on Iraq or Gore's position on Afghanistan today.

40 years ago the Left wanted to nationalize health care, yet today you won't hear an electable Leftist even *breathe* such a threat (though they very well still want it) out loud.

40 years ago the Left wore red T-shirts stating "The Time is Mao", hardly something that you see in Washington today (outside of a few imported protesters, anyway).

In contrast, the Right has been winning battle after battle by pursuing incrementalism. We control the Supreme Court, the House, the Senate, the Presidency, more than half of all state governors, and more than half of all state legislatures.

40 years ago there were more Democrats registered to vote (by almost 2 to 1), than Republicans. Today, they are about even in numbers.

40 years ago all unions were Democratic on all issues, but today unions are FIGHTING Democrats and Leftists regarding new job creation through drilling in the ANWR and rejecting the Kyoto Global Warming Treaty.

40 years ago Congress was passing national gun control laws. Today, Congress is arming pilots and immunizing gun manufacturers from frivolous lawsuits.

40 years ago the U.S. was willing to sign the CCCP-U.S. ABM treaty, but today we are willing to reject it.

And we didn't get this far from where we were 40 years ago by throwing long bomb passes every down. No, we did it through incrementalism.

This is precisely what Bush is doing today. We get one tax cut, fine. Then he goes for another and gets it, too. Some provisions aren't "permanent", so later he goes for extending or even making them permanent. Old treaties, one by one, get rejected. Old executive orders and regulations, one by one, get rejected or reversed.

Incrementally, Bush is rolling back the Left. The International Cirminal Court no longer threatens Americans. CO2 regulations are no longer choking electricity providers. Families of four making $40,000 per year are now only paying $45 per year in federal income taxes. The U.S. Dollar is no longer so over-valued that it props up the exporting economies of old, socialist Europe. The newspaper industry is no longer provided an anti-competitive monopoly position that prohibits conservative radio companies from buying newspapers or starting up fresh competition.

Little by little, the Left is being rolled back. In the next 6 years, Bush will even get vouchers passed, and private schools will soon thereafter destroy the political power of the public school teachers' unions.

But none of this would have been possible if Bush had tried to go for it all in one step. It had to come one small piece at a time. Removing the double taxation of dividends was clearly *not* something that could have been done in the first tax cut, for instance, but it was possible in the 2nd.

47 posted on 06/16/2003 11:19:43 AM PDT by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Southack
Hell!

Forty years ago, John F. Kennedy was a staunch anti-communist.

Today his Party is populated with communists.

Little wonder they never mention JFK anymore.
50 posted on 06/16/2003 3:00:19 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Cuba serĂ¡ libre...soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Southack
The article was written at a time referring to 1959 or 60. crowds of people weren't wearing Mao Tee shirts then. Now if you are talking about 1968, that was a different world than five or six years earlier. How old are you?
51 posted on 06/16/2003 6:26:55 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson