[Lazamataz]

I think Newt underestimates her chances. I'll write an essay today (or in the next few days) to describe why.

[Mulder]

I think Newt underestimates her chances.

I put her chances at better than 50%, and that's if she ran in 2004. Reasons are as follows:

1) More immigrants (legal and illegal) who come from statist countries. Whoever the RATS nominate will appeal to this group.

2) Voter fraud in the metropolitan cesspools.

3) A lot of women will vote for the "first woman to run for president".

4) A sluggish economy with rising unemployment.

5) A conservative base which is disatisfied because of Bush's stances on guns, globalization, and increased gov't. A lot of folks are going to sit at home in 2004 unless the trend is reversed.

[my_pointy_head_is_sharp]

I think Newt underestimates her chances. I'll write an essay today (or in the next few days) to describe why.

No, don't. You'll just give her ideas on how she can improve her chances.

[the gillman@blacklagoon.com]

I put her at about 75%

[templar]

I think Newt underestimates her chances.

Substantially underestimates them, I think.

[CyberAnt]

I'd sooner believe Susan Estrich. She certainly has been bold in her statements. Susan said that people have to realize how polarizing and divisive Hitlery is and that if she becomes a candidate, Hitlery will end up motivating the right to a level never before seen, and a lot of dems don't like her either.

Although no one else is saying this - Susan was right on about the last several attacks from the dems leveled at Bush. She was quite candid about the attacks and said they were wrong and they would only end up harming the dems - she turned out to be correct.