Again, you're assuming that because you don't know much, neither does anyone else here. That everyone else is debating from strength of factual knowledge and you are attempting refutiation, based on soke, is your problem.
Wrong. One learns, if one learns at all, by debating. Also I wonder if you aren't applying a double standard...simply because you don't like my opinions.
Again, you're assuming that because you don't know much, neither does anyone else here
Wrong. Did it ever occur to you that I post to a conservative form under the name Liberallarry precisely because I question my opinions and value some of what I find here?
Many of the " intellectuals ", throughout American history, have been on the wrong side of issues
The heart of the matter.
Many intellectuals (no slanderous quotation marks) have also been on the right side of issues. The fact is these issues are complicated, many supposed facts are not facts at all, many interpretations are possible and believable. No sources are entirely trustworthy (but we must give at least provisional trust to some if we are to know anything at all) because all people have limitations and biases, and make mistakes. I make no apology for being human, for being wrong. There's no shame in it.