Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U. FRAUD! ALUMNI RIP BLAIR'S WORK (pre-NYT Blair)
NY POST ^ | June 15, 2003

Posted on 06/15/2003 2:39:21 AM PDT by Liz

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:14:44 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

COLLEGE PARK, Md. - A group of 30 former student journalists at the University of Maryland say disgraced reporter Jayson Blair wrote questionable articles and manipulated his mentors while on campus in the mid-1990s - just as he did at The New York Times.


(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: jaysonblair; nyt; umd
As editor, Blair kept the paper's finances secret and withheld earned pay from reporters and editors.

Has the NYT check their books lately? Or are they holding back more information from the public about Blair's scams? Or maybe the gullible liberals still have no clue.

1 posted on 06/15/2003 2:39:21 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Liz; Timesink; PJ-Comix; Bonaparte; Grampa Dave
I wonder if the people at the NYT knew about this part of Blair's past.
2 posted on 06/15/2003 3:07:54 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
They know it know. I suppose you mean did they know when they hired him?

I tend to think they knew something but as we now know, gullible liberals, with their copout thinking, probably said, "Oh schucks, Jayson's a swell guy, that's just racist talk.'

3 posted on 06/15/2003 3:11:42 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Liz; All
-The Old Grey Info-Slut... the NYT/Jayson Blair Affair--
4 posted on 06/15/2003 4:39:39 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aristeides; Liz
I'm sure that after they hired him, they were told. The newspaper business is very clanny.

Of course this data wouldn't made them change their mind about him. I think that they knew exactly what he was. Being a double minority gay/black, he was their perfect tool to "write" lies and help the NY Slimes in their political wars.
5 posted on 06/15/2003 8:08:00 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Support The Brave Iranian Students as they bring about a needed regime change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
I think that they knew exactly what he was. Being a double minority gay/black, he
was their perfect tool to "write" lies and help the NY Slimes in their political wars.

Gramps, this incites me to go into my un-PC rant. So, hang in there, here goes:

Knee-jerk liberals took the world's best meritocracy system and cannibalized it, putting it through the political correctness meatgrinder. Liberal cannibals effectively silenced free speech and all reasonable arguments against their PC atrocities by employing the club of hate crime laws (which penalize only conservatives).

PC and hate crimes laws have outlived their usefulness. They are the Prohibition of this era. Prohibtion was necessarily repealed b/c it caused social chaos and a crime wave. We have yet to tally the crimes caused by PC atrocities and hate crimes laws, but it is huge.

The Blair debacle epitomizes the devastation wrought upon America due to hate crimes laws and PC.

Thankfully, astute conservatives have always seen right through these self-serving liberal phonies and their arrogant use of PC and hate crimes laws to stifle criticism

6 posted on 06/15/2003 11:34:59 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
"I wonder if the people at the NYT knew..."

If they did, I'm sure it didn't faze them. The Sulzbergers have never shied away from inveterate liars on their staff. Case in point is Walter Duranty. Many decades after the NYT's deliberate white-washing of Stalin's atrocities through that correspondent's articles, they still stand behind him.

So why would they be taken aback by a penny ante liar like Blair? If other papers hadn't raised a ruckus and caused them embarassment, he would still be working there. And so would Raines and Boyd, despite their incompetence and the demoralization they continued to cause among NYT staff.

IMO, the only "mistake" they intend to correct is the plagiarism of other newsmens' work. As they have discovered, that is the one transgression that will cause other mainstream media liberals to turn on them with a vengeance. Everything else gets a pass. Dowd and others at the NYT will all continue to lie and will all get a pass. All they have to do is not step on the wrong toes.

7 posted on 06/15/2003 12:14:59 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte; Liz
Duranty's successor at the New York Times wasn't any better. In 1934 Denny reported from Moscow that the harvest in the Ukraine was a "victory for collectivization" and he, himself, had tasted "honey fresh from Bolshevik bees."

A more recent useful New York Times idiot was Sydney Schanberg. On April 13, 1975, an article he wrote from Phnom Penh was titled: "Indochina without Americans: for most, a better life."

oops...

Sidney, of course, still has his Pulitzer.

Not a Republican giveth a speech at Bob Jones University without the New York Times taketh note. But the Times has a real problem noticing when millions of dead bodies are littering the streets of communist hell-holes.

8 posted on 06/15/2003 12:37:13 PM PDT by DPB101 (The Marines) have a propaganda machine that is almost equal to Stalin's." --Harry Truman.1950)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
What is it about guys named Sidney? ;-)

An un-PC history of the NYT came out a few years ago, detailing a lot of this. It may even have had the words "gray lady" in the title or subtitle. I've looked for it without success. Do you recall this book or its author?

9 posted on 06/15/2003 1:25:08 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
Sidney, of course, still has his Pulitzer.

Dear Sidney,

This is a FReeper official notice: Give back the Pulitzer or we'll Freep the beejeezus out of you.

Signed, Liz
FR Swat Team General

10 posted on 06/15/2003 2:45:21 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Lol....but let's not be biased ourselves here. TV reporters deserve credit for what they did too. What awards do they get we can seek to have revoked?

Table 12.1: Weeknight Network Coverage
of the "New Society" and Human Rights
in Cambodia, April 1975 - December 1978
. April-
June
1975
July-
Dec.
1975
Jan.-
June
1976
July-
Dec.
1976
Jan.-
June
1977
July-
Dec.
1977
Jan.-
June
1978
July-
Dec.
1978
Total
ABC .
. Time 0:20 4:10 3:10 -- -- -- 0:30 3:15 11:25
Number of stories 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 6
CBS .
. Time 1:00 -- 2:30 3:40 2:30 3:40 11:40 3:55 28:55
Number of stories 2 0 1 1 1 2 4 2 13
NBC .
. Time 1:00 2:20 -- -- 0:40 4:00 6:40 2:55 17:35
Number of stories 1 2 0 0 1 2 3 2 11

Details here
11 posted on 06/15/2003 3:56:35 PM PDT by DPB101 ("Smearing good people like Alger Hiss and Lauchlin Currie is . . .unforgivable"---Eleanor Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
Nice, very nice, find.
12 posted on 06/15/2003 4:05:24 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
That may have been Gay Talese's Book....."The Kingdom and the Power"..... I posted excerpts on one of the earlier Blair threads.
13 posted on 06/15/2003 4:08:28 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
Don't recall the book and I've searched trying to find something which fits your description. Please flag me if you find it.

Wouldn't it be great if the New York Times morgue was on CD? Imagine what we would find.

Fox News carried the Duranty story again tonight. All the paper will say is that he won the Pulitzer for an earlier dispatch which didn't deny the Holodomor. End of story.

So they think.

14 posted on 06/15/2003 6:11:29 PM PDT by DPB101 ("Smearing good people like Alger Hiss and Lauchlin Currie is . . .unforgivable"---Eleanor Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DPB101; Liz
"So they think."

Hehe. I'm afraid the NYT can't win this one. Either they cave on the Duranty Pulitzer or the controversy never goes away. Does the NYT really want people constantly hearing about how the Gray Lady hid the murders of millions of innocent people under her skirts?

Of course, the Pulitzer committee may wind up making the decision for them.

Thanks, Liz, but it's not the Talese book. If I find it, I'll buzz you and DPB.

15 posted on 06/15/2003 9:52:26 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DPB101; Bonaparte
For bgrnd info try surfing over at Navigator......NYT reporters use this site.
16 posted on 06/15/2003 10:01:56 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson