Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nasa gives go-ahead for nuclear mission to outer planets
The Independent ^ | June 14, 2003 | Steve Connor

Posted on 06/14/2003 7:33:15 PM PDT by gcruse

An ambitious and controversial mission to explore the other planets of the solar system using nuclear-powered spacecraft has come a step closer after Nasa gave a giant aerospace company the go-ahead to develop revolutionary new engines.

The aim is to build an interplanetary space probe powerful enough to fly vast distances and still to have enough power to collect scientific information and send it back to Earth.

Nasa, the US's National Aeronautics and Space Administration, is giving $6m (£4.3m) to the American company Lockheed Martin to investigate the concepts needed to build such a deep-space explorer powered by a miniature nuclear reactor.

Project Prometheus, named after the Greek god who gave fire to humanity, will concentrate on nuclear propulsion because it is considered the only form of power that can meet the mission's requirements.

But critics will question the safety of launching potentially dangerous nuclear material into space, especially after the technical failures that led to shuttle crash earlier this year.

Nasa said an immediate goal of Prometheus was to provide the propulsion to send a spacecraft to the planet-sized moons of Jupiter - Callisto, Ganymede and Europa - which may harbour life beneath their icy surfaces.

Solar-powered instruments would be of little help in analysing the moons and planets of the outer solar system, where the sunlight is weak and ineffectual. Nasa has decided, therefore, that only a nuclear-fission reactor would provide sufficient electricity to probe these worlds.

Existing space probes have reached as far as Jupiter and beyond but they have had to operate on the power equivalent to a few electric lightbulbs, which has severely limited what they could do, where they could go and what they could transmit back to Earth.

A nuclear-powered spacecraft could not only operate powerful radars and other remote-sensing instruments but use its engines to travel more freely instead of relying on the gravitational "sling-shot" technique that limits the trajectory of existing probes.

"Project Prometheus will develop the means to efficiently increase power for spacecraft, thereby fundamentally increasing our capability for Solar System exploration," Nasa said. "Increased power for spacecraft means not only travelling farther or faster, but is also means exploring more efficiently with enormously greater scientific return."

The first candidate for nuclear propulsion, the Jupiter Icy Moons Orbiter (Jimo), is unlikely to be launched before 2011 because of the time needed to build the spacecraft. However, as a fleet of space probes heads for Mars over the coming two years, the next target is likely to be Europa and its vast ice-covered ocean, confirmed by the space probe Galileo. Last year, the US National Research Council ranked a Europa orbiter as top priority for a "flagship" mission because of the possibility it might harbour life.

Nasa scientists calculate that a nuclear-fission reactor on the Jimo spacecraft would give it a hundred times more power than a comparable space probe powered by solar panels. A reactor for a spacecraft would have to be about 10,000 times smaller than typical scientific reactors used on the ground.

It would also have to incorporate safety enhancement. One feature is for the reactors to remain "cold" - not turned on - until they are well beyond Earth's orbit. Another is to ensure that once the mission is over the spacecraft is sent into a trajectory that takes it well away from Earth.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/14/2003 7:33:15 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gcruse
This would make Carl Sagan proud.
2 posted on 06/14/2003 7:33:53 PM PDT by rs79bm (The difference between Los Angeles and yogurt is that yogurt comes with less fruit ... R. Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rs79bm
It would make Nikola Tesla nervous.
3 posted on 06/14/2003 7:39:10 PM PDT by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nitro
LOL! Yes it would. I remember studying the Tesla Coil back in physics when I was in college.
4 posted on 06/14/2003 7:45:12 PM PDT by rs79bm (The difference between Los Angeles and yogurt is that yogurt comes with less fruit ... R. Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Prof Engineer
ping
5 posted on 06/14/2003 7:46:45 PM PDT by msdrby (I do believe the cheese slid off his cracker! - The Green Mile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
OK. Build it in Earth orbit.

But don't allow it to start those novel engines until it has permanently escaped Earth's gravitational field.

Sorry, but NASA has lost a lot of trust, including mine.

6 posted on 06/14/2003 7:47:40 PM PDT by LibKill (MOAB, the greatest advance in Foreign Relations since the cat-o'-nine-tails!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibKill
I agree with you. But it is simply the only way to explore the outer regions of the solar system. Until now, we have relied entirely on solar energy, which has it's disadvantages, such as running out of power as soon as you lose sight of the sun.
7 posted on 06/14/2003 7:51:20 PM PDT by rs79bm (The difference between Los Angeles and yogurt is that yogurt comes with less fruit ... R. Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rs79bm
I'm all up for paying a little more taxes for this exploration.

I just don't want anymore NASA debris coming down on Texas.

I think that's fair.

8 posted on 06/14/2003 7:53:41 PM PDT by LibKill (MOAB, the greatest advance in Foreign Relations since the cat-o'-nine-tails!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Interesting.
9 posted on 06/14/2003 7:53:51 PM PDT by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rs79bm
You laugh at Tesla?

Do you laugh at the Chixilub Event?

10 posted on 06/14/2003 8:09:58 PM PDT by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nitro
Of course not. Tesla invented "electrical" everything. Just about everything we use Tesla had something to do with. In this case we are talking nuclear, which of course would make Tesla nervous.
11 posted on 06/14/2003 8:13:47 PM PDT by rs79bm (The difference between Los Angeles and yogurt is that yogurt comes with less fruit ... R. Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rs79bm
bah humbug

We need Project Orion, or at lest a Nerva
12 posted on 06/14/2003 8:15:48 PM PDT by AlextheWise1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
This article acts as if nuclear power in deep space probes is something new. Its not. Pioneer 10, 11 , Voyager one and two, Galileo and the upcoming Cassini Saturn mission all are nuclear powered. The only thing new is if they are using nuclear propulsion.
13 posted on 06/14/2003 10:18:59 PM PDT by Nateman (Socialism first, cancer second.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman
This article acts as if nuclear power in deep space probes is something new. Its not. Pioneer 10, 11 , Voyager one and two, Galileo and the upcoming Cassini Saturn mission all are nuclear powered. The only thing new is if they are using nuclear propulsion.

There is a difference here. The power on the above mentioned spacecraft is due to decay heat from specific isotopes. An RTG is not considered a nuclear reactor. What is proposed is an actual nuclear reactor that will be used for propulsion or power similar to the SP-100 or NERVA.

14 posted on 06/19/2003 11:54:12 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson