Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JakeWyld
Morality is never involved in telling others how to live. Morality consists in how one governs oneself. The State does have a function in protecting morality, but that has to do with preventing conduct which undermines personal morality.

The distinction is very vital. George Washington, for example, pointed out that our system was rooted and depended upon private morals. That did not mean that he advocated a host of new laws intended to make people more moral--exactly the opposite. He understood that people who did not have the moral fibre to regulate their own conduct in accordance with a system of moral values, could hardly be trusted with the affairs of State--or with handling your business or commercial interests, either.

There is no need for you to explain a conflict between your traditional Conservatism and Libertarian values. There is none. Your family might have erred in the direction of going overboard in tyring to protect social morals, or they might not have. But that involves other issues. My point is that there is no reason for any divide between the Conservative and Libertarian bases of America, over morality.

William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site

17 posted on 06/14/2003 12:33:28 PM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Ohioan
I agree. You say things much better than I could have.
23 posted on 06/14/2003 1:11:20 PM PDT by JakeWyld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson