1 posted on
06/13/2003 12:08:11 PM PDT by
F_Cohen
To: F_Cohen
The public reticule of women,He carries a bunch of women in a purse? Or did they mean "ridicule?"
2 posted on
06/13/2003 12:12:29 PM PDT by
Tax-chick
(You can't tell from his pictures how short he is.)
To: F_Cohen
Too bad Eileen Wellstone won't come forward. She was the 2nd woman that Clintoon raped in '69 and Broaddrick in '78. What I found the most interesting is that Clintoon (Attorney General of Arkansas) told Broaddrick she wouldn't get pregnant after he raped her because he was sterile. Chelsea was born in 1980 two years after the rape of Broaddrick. The question begging to be asked: Who then is Chelsea's biological parent? Many women have children out of wedlock. That's not the emphasis. Hitlery was married with Bubba being groomed for either the governorship or the presidency. Read the FR posting "Morris Details Clinton Violence" with reference to corroboration by Ray Strother (see
http://www.booknotes.org/Transcript/?ProgramID=1730). This amoral couple didn't need a child for their climb to the WH or did they? At what lengths did this ambitious, power-hungry couple go for the ultimate climb to occupy the WH? Who did they sell their souls to?
To: F_Cohen
Its not that rape doesnt matter, its that the Broadrick rape will never be proven and its a waste of time to continue to debate it.
If the woman had had the courage of her convictions, she would brought charges when it could have saved us from eight years of Clinton. She did not do so. Now, continuing to bitch about it now does absolutely no good. It's a waste of time and it belittles those who argue it. There is a reason that we have time limits during which charges much be brought. It's due to the utter unfairness of attempting to defend yourself from a criminal charge years after possible witnesses have died and other evidence has disappeared. How many of us can remember where we were at 10 am of last Tuesday, much less in 1978 or whenever.
5 posted on
06/13/2003 12:37:13 PM PDT by
Dave S
To: F_Cohen
Leftists don't care.
It doesn't matter that Stalin murdered millions.
It doesn't matter that Klinton was a rapist, a swindler, a perjurer, a traitor, etc.
To them it doesn't matter.
But it matters to all of us who hate the SOB. And we'll NEVER forget or forgive.
6 posted on
06/13/2003 12:39:29 PM PDT by
jimt
To: F_Cohen
Hell, I haven't forgiven Teddy for drowning Mary Jo!
8 posted on
06/13/2003 12:43:25 PM PDT by
SwinneySwitch
(Freedom is not Free - Support the Troops!)
To: F_Cohen
Taking into account Clarence Thomas' ordeal after being charged with inappropriate jokes and pubic hairs on Coke cans, should there be any doubt? Yet that identical story of rape levied by Juanita Broaddrick against Bill Clinton is not an issue or a story, and never has been. You equate a weak case of sexual harrasment with rape? Also, there was at least some justification for bringing up the case against Thomas in that he was being placed on the Supreme Court and hearings were already taking place. Clinton is running for nothing. He's just a joke that most people would like to forget.
The single question on the matter directed at the Clinton White House was deferred to an attorney. And there it ended. It's easy to conceive of Richard Nixon serving out his second term if the first question regarding Watergate was dismissed with the press allowing it to end there.
Duh, how many times have you seen in the conservative press? Dont say it got asked once and the issue disappeared. Thats disingenous. BTW, in case you werent around during Watergate, the press did ignore the whole issue for more than six months. The only reporters that were pursuing the breakin were Woodward & Bernstein. Most of the press didnt want to dirty their hands covering Watergate. Most of them, as liberal as they were didnt think that Nixon himself was involved. Not until the tapes came out.
10 posted on
06/13/2003 12:47:40 PM PDT by
Dave S
It's acrimoniously suggested that we "move on". My favorite response, if you can have a "favorite response" to such things, is to ask a liberal who says "it's time to move on"... When is it OK to move on after rape? Is it a month, a year, 2 years, 5 years, 10 years, 20 years, or 50 years? Just tell me when it's OK to "move on" after rape? Most shut up after that.
I then ask them if they've even heard Juanita Broadderick talk of the rape and most say "No." I offer to let them see my copy of the NBC interview; I even offer to make them their own personal copy. All have declined.
Then I ask them if serious allegations of rape are important to them? They usually say "Yes." I then ask, "Why isn't Clinton's rape important?"
I almost always get silence.
28 posted on
06/13/2003 1:37:32 PM PDT by
BFM
(Clinton IS a rapist)
To: F_Cohen
The Clintons have shown the world the power the mainstream media has. If even half of the charges were leveled at George W. that have been said of Clinton he would have been toast long ago.
I think rape charges are the tip of the Clinton iceberg. His true legacy will include murder and treason.
31 posted on
06/13/2003 1:56:46 PM PDT by
Bullish
To: F_Cohen
Thanks for posting this.
BTTT.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson