Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/12/2003 12:48:49 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: churchillbuff
A poll came out and it said that Santorum's comments had ZERO effect in Pennsylvania.

His approval before the comments was 55%, and after the remarks it was still 55%.

The "controversy" went nowhere.
2 posted on 06/12/2003 12:51:56 PM PDT by Pubbie (Bill Owens for Prez and Jeb as VP in '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
A friend insists the GOP should stay away from this issue.

Coward. Does the friend want the conservatives to cave on every issue?

3 posted on 06/12/2003 12:52:10 PM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff; Pubbie
Poll: Gay Issue Causes Little Pain for Santorum
4 posted on 06/12/2003 12:57:51 PM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
People have been intimidated into silence but not passion. Most people still think it's immoral, they just now afraid to speak out. But just like Saddam discovered, forced allegiance is flimsy allegiance. Most people would not change their vote over this (except those who don't vote GOP anyway).
5 posted on 06/12/2003 1:04:38 PM PDT by RAT Patrol (Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. -W.W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
If Santorum's polls had gone negative, you would have heard it shouted from every liberal mouthpiece in America.

Ergo, the silence tells you what you need to know.

6 posted on 06/12/2003 1:06:40 PM PDT by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
And a RAT attempt to lott Rick Santorum goes down in flaming defeat.
9 posted on 06/12/2003 2:10:31 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
The most important point, IMHO, is that it was not a gay issue. It was a constitutional issue which the liberals tried to spin into gay bashing in order to try to compromise Santorum and perhaps drive him out of the Senate where the Republicans hold a slim lead. We must get over the habit of being cowed by the liberals and their handmaidens in the media (and the trial lawyers). Santorum did an excellent job that will serve him and the Republicans well.
10 posted on 06/12/2003 2:23:57 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
Santorum
11 posted on 06/12/2003 2:27:14 PM PDT by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
I am from Santorum's voter district in PA.

We LOVE him ^_^!!!

Here is a story about a poll conducted in PA of his voters.

http://www.cwfa.org/articles/4020/CWA/family/index.htm

75% of voters did not want Santorum to step down from his #3 position in the Senate. When Republicans take a stand for their voters it can only help. Specter is a louse although I'm frightened his district very much likes his stance.

Anyhoo!

Go Toomey Go!
12 posted on 06/12/2003 3:36:32 PM PDT by kuma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
It had absolutley no effect on him, either in the state, or nationally, in fact, what was bizzare was that people who didn't know anything about him, but had preconcieved notions, didn't alter there views either.

The white house played it smart, they knew this story had no legs and wasn't worth even talking about, they made some lame line like "he an inclusive man" and dropped it. They were not going to help the media try and sell papers and draw ratings. Brent Bozelle did a nice time line that showed how pathetic the attempt was to where in the last days, the media was drudging up a polyigamist to comment.

13 posted on 06/12/2003 4:47:59 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
I live in the Pittsburgh area...and from what I read in the local papers, it was much ado about nothing. Santorum pretty much speaks the position of the Catholic Church--and this is a heavily Catholic part of the the country. The great paradox is the old time Catholics (who would most closely follow the Church) vote Dim around here...and the younger, enlightened types (less likely to follow Church dogma) vote R...so it was kind of a nonevent here...Now if we could only get Arlen to retire...
14 posted on 06/12/2003 7:01:38 PM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom (Don't mess with a SCOWderPuffGirl!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson