Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice at last for critic of Stalinism? (Welsh paper vs New York Times Walter Duranty)
The Western Mail ^ | 6/12/03 | Tomos Livingstone

Posted on 06/12/2003 8:04:30 AM PDT by DPB101

AN infamous apologist for Stalinist Russia, who ridiculed a legendary Welsh journalist's claims that the regime was causing the starvation of millions of people, could be stripped of the Pulitzer Prize he won 70 years ago .

Any move to revoke the award won by Walter Duranty of the New York Times in 1932 would further vindicate Gareth Jones, who first exposed the 1932-33 Ukrainian famine in which millions died - an event Duranty denied had happened.

Campaigners have been bombarding the prize's committee with postcards and e-mails demanding Duranty, who died in 1957, be stripped of the prize, and a review is now reported to be under way.

When Jones, who wrote for The Western Mail, announced at a press conference in Berlin March 29, 1933 that millions were starving in Ukraine as a result of Stalin's five-year-plan, several foreign correspondents rushed to rubbish the story.

The most vocal was Walter Duranty of the New York Times, who had won a Pulitzer Prize in 1932 for his own reports on Stalin's Russia.

He dismissed Jones's eye-witness account as "a big scare story" and insisted there was "no actual starvation".

In May 1932 the New York Times printed Mr Jones's response to the controversy. In a furious attack on the coterie of foreign correspondents, Mr Jones congratulated "the Soviet Foreign Office on its skill in concealing the true situation in the USSR."

Now a campaign organised by Ukrainians worldwide is putting pressure on the board of the Pulitzer Prize to reconsider Duranty's award.

The campaign has been given added momentum by the present-day problems at the New York Times, where the editor and managing editor have been forced to resign over a scandal involving 27-year-old reporter Jayson Blair, who has admitted fabricating dozens of articles for the paper.

The 18-member board which decides the awards, one of the most prestigious in world journalism, is now conducting a secret review of Duranty's award.

Gareth Jones, who was born in Barry in 1905, was regarded as one of the most talented journalists of his generation.

He wrote for The Western Mail, The Times and The Manchester Guardian as well as the Berliner Tageblatt and American newspapers.

He travelled through Russia and Ukraine in the early 1930s and was shocked at the famine conditions he encountered.

An estimated seven to 10 million people died between 1932 and 1933, an event Ukrainians call the Holodomor.

His career survived the controversy over the Ukrainian reports, but his life was tragically cut short when he was murdered by bandits in 1935 while travelling in Inner Mongolia. He was just 29 years old.

Mr Jones's niece Dr Siriol Colley has written a book about her uncle's life, A Manchukuo Incident.

She has been inundated with calls and e-mails from Ukrainian campaign groups keen to set the record straight on what they regard as their biggest national disaster.

She said, "Gareth was a man of integrity. He wanted to promote the fact that Stalin, and his five-year plan, was going badly wrong.

"The revoking of the award is a token and acknowledgement of the terrible famine - the Holodomor - which the world had no idea about - the facts which were suppressed by Stalin, his cohorts and Duranty was the medium to misinform the world press."

Her son Nigel Colley has suggested Gareth Jones should be posthumously awarded the prize.

One of the campaigners for the revocation of the prize is Dr Natalia Pylypiuk , an academic based in Edmonton, Canada.

Her mother, Anna Wlasenko, 12-years-old in 1933, survived the famine, despite being assumed dead and thrown into a mass grave.

In her letter to the Pulitzer committee she wrote, "As my family sits down in October to celebrate her 82nd birthday and to commemorate all those grandparents, uncles, and aunts who did not survive 1933, there could be no greater gift than being able to announce that, finally, Mr Duranty's unworthiness has been acknowledged by the Pulitzer committee."

Writing about Duranty in the 1970s, Guardian correspondent Malcolm Muggeridge, who also reported on the famine - anonymously - at the same time as Jones, said, "He admired Stalin and the regime precisely because they were so strong and ruthless. 'I put my money on Stalin' was one of his favourite sayings."

The Pulitzer board has only ever revoked a prize once, in 1981. Washington Post reporter Janet Cooke's story of an eight-year-old ghetto boy already addicted to heroin was revealed to be a fabrication.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: DPB101
Very interesting reading.I had no idea about the bombing episodes or Palmer.How very unPC he was!Deporting the people who wished to destroy our government sounds so sane!Returning them to a country whose virtues they extol while they condemn this country's government sounds humane!I think we cannot forget our depression era was worldwide and communism was gaining strength.The fact our unions did not go communist says something very good about American workers and the value Americans place on their individuality. Reds continue to be a threat.
41 posted on 06/16/2003 2:55:15 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Exactly. Amazing we survived. There were more good people than rats. AFL was always anticommunist. CIO was the problem. The AFL-CIO was great in fighting the Cold War. Clinton and Sweeney changed that. For the first time in its history, the AFL-CIO now allows members of the Communist Party USA to hold official positions in the union.
42 posted on 06/16/2003 3:00:18 AM PDT by DPB101 ("Smearing good people like Alger Hiss and Lauchlin Currie is . . .unforgivable"---Eleanor Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
I was not aware.
43 posted on 06/16/2003 3:02:54 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
I ,too,would love to see the Castro fawning exposed.
44 posted on 06/16/2003 3:05:58 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
I thank you again for all your work on this.
45 posted on 06/16/2003 3:07:52 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
...AFL was always anticommunist. CIO was the problem. The AFL-CIO was great in fighting the Cold War. Clinton and Sweeney changed that. For the first time in its history, the AFL-CIO now allows members of the Communist Party USA to hold official positions in the union.

Isn't there a Marxist group in the US Congress called "Socialist for in Democratic AmeriKa"...also more on the 1930s' Famine...the Book, "A Harvest of Sorrow".

46 posted on 06/16/2003 3:30:34 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid,doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass
...a Marxist group in the US Congress called "Socialists for a Democratic Amerika"...sorry, no coffee.
47 posted on 06/16/2003 3:37:00 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid,doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: blau993
Well off-topic, but I actually saw Janet Cooke in Kalamazoo, Michigan outside the department store where she worked - a very pretty woman.
48 posted on 06/16/2003 3:46:41 AM PDT by NukeMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AnnaZ
Is it just a coincidence that SURRENDER is the WORD OF THE DAY?
49 posted on 06/16/2003 1:16:55 PM PDT by Feiny (Buying someone a drink is five times better than a handshake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
Thanks for the link
50 posted on 06/16/2003 1:36:36 PM PDT by Gothmog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
'bout time bump
51 posted on 06/16/2003 2:39:41 PM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
An inspiring thread!

Great work.

52 posted on 06/17/2003 6:07:19 AM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
Just a great thread with links
53 posted on 06/30/2003 10:56:32 PM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: katz
Over here...you need to read this.
54 posted on 06/30/2003 11:00:13 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Thanks. I have just read it. Get with you later.
55 posted on 07/01/2003 7:10:28 PM PDT by katz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
As I read the link, I wonder what is wrong with the NY Times?

The Times runs ads for subscriptions on my local TV.

Perhaps Coulter's book will reveal some of this. I'm still only at page 45 - 54.
56 posted on 07/01/2003 7:19:13 PM PDT by katz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: katz
What's wrong with the N.Y. Times ? LOL Have you a few years? Not to worry ... I'll talk it all over with you later. :-)
57 posted on 07/01/2003 11:03:14 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson