Hmmm...
1 posted on
06/11/2003 12:09:44 PM PDT by
Pubbie
To: Pubbie
"A proof is a proof. What kind of proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof it's proven." Holy crap, did he really say that? And people make fun of Bush???
2 posted on
06/11/2003 12:17:28 PM PDT by
smith288
(The government doesn't need to save me from myself. Im quite capable thank you.)
To: Pubbie
Nice.
3 posted on
06/11/2003 12:19:43 PM PDT by
m1911
To: Pubbie; marron; quidnunc; CanadianConservative
February 9, 1998 A date before TotalFinaElf made it's deal with Saddam, so Chretien had nothing to lose by telling the truth then.
5 posted on
06/11/2003 12:24:13 PM PDT by
Shermy
To: Pubbie
True, and I do detect a strong whiff of hypocricy here, but Clinton hasn't been President since 2000 and lots could have happened in two years. On the other hand, I find it almost impossible to believe that if Saddam had the weapons by no later than the end of Clinton's Presidency, he destroyed them sometime afterwards (at least until just before the war began). To the contrary, he acted like someone who was hiding something.
6 posted on
06/11/2003 12:24:48 PM PDT by
kesg
To: Pubbie
Ping.
10 posted on
06/11/2003 3:05:26 PM PDT by
Ragtime Cowgirl
("The American people are proud of you and God bless each of you." Rummy to troops in Iraq)
To: Pubbie
It all depends on what the meaning of proof is is is.
11 posted on
06/11/2003 4:15:33 PM PDT by
freeangel
(freeangel)
To: Pubbie
Awesome article.
And yes, he did say that!
12 posted on
06/11/2003 4:18:01 PM PDT by
Enduring Freedom
(To smash the ugly face of Socialism is our mission.)
To: Pubbie
Wow! Chretien believed but wouldn't act. Is it because of his interest in the French-owned Total Fina Elf that was the largest oil producer in Iraq before the collapse of Iraq?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson