Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Physicist
Do you or do you not believe that all the skulls identified as Neanderthal have been deliberately modified?

After seeing the photos in the book, I believe that MANY of them were altered for sure. I do not know if all of them have.

Now, please show me the evidence used to reach the conclusions in this article.

42 posted on 06/11/2003 10:07:01 AM PDT by exmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: exmarine
After seeing the photos in the book, I believe that MANY of them were altered for sure. I do not know if all of them have.

"Mr. Simpson, you're free to go on your own recognizance."

Now, please show me the evidence used to reach the conclusions in this article.

Does that skull at the top of the thread look human to you? It does to the researchers, too (although their conclusions are more quantitative). That's the point of the article. As for the dating of the skull, you'll have to read the paper yourself.

93 posted on 06/11/2003 11:51:19 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: exmarine
"Now, please show me the evidence used to reach the conclusions in this article."

Tim White's argument for dating these fossils at 160,000 years: A) They are about what I would expect for 160,000 yrs.

B) I'm an expert. From Berkeley.

C) Trust me, I know.

301 posted on 06/12/2003 6:19:38 PM PDT by cookcounty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson