Skip to comments.
POLL: Armed Pilots
Seattle Post-Intelligencer ^
| 6/10/03
| Seattle P-I
Posted on 06/10/2003 2:32:47 PM PDT by AStack75
Poll on the right side of the page...
Should commercial airline pilots be armed with weapons in the cockpit?
Yes
No
Don't Know
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
1
posted on
06/10/2003 2:32:47 PM PDT
by
AStack75
To: bang_list
2
posted on
06/10/2003 2:33:09 PM PDT
by
AStack75
To: AStack75
Freeped
3
posted on
06/10/2003 2:43:35 PM PDT
by
hattend
To: All
4
posted on
06/10/2003 2:48:44 PM PDT
by
newgeezer
("...until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury.")
To: AStack75
Bump!
5
posted on
06/10/2003 2:53:00 PM PDT
by
tiamat
("Just a Bronze-Age Gal, Trapped in a Techno World!")
To: tiamat
Should commercial airline pilots be armed with weapons in the cockpit? Freeped
Yes = 56.3%
No = 37.7%
Don't know = 6.0%
Total Votes: 2221
Why would one go to the trouble of voting, "I don't know???
Eaker
6
posted on
06/10/2003 2:56:51 PM PDT
by
Eaker
(Adiós reality; I want to be a Jack-Ass millionaire!!............;<)
To: AStack75
Who do you suppose are the idiots who accounted for a 38% "No" vote?
7
posted on
06/10/2003 2:57:25 PM PDT
by
Ole Okie
To: AStack75
Done!
8
posted on
06/10/2003 2:59:39 PM PDT
by
MonroeDNA
(Unions and Marxists say, " Workers of the world unite!")
To: Shooter 2.5
Bumped.
I've often wondered about the intelligence of someone who would go to the trouble of voting in an online poll only to say, "I don't know".
9
posted on
06/10/2003 3:02:24 PM PDT
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: AStack75
56.5% Yes
37.5% No
5.9% registered democrats who graduated this year who not only Don't know, they have no idea what a pilot is.
To: AStack75
DAILY POLL
Should commercial airline pilots be armed with weapons in the cockpit?
56.7%
Yes
37.3%
No
5.9%
Don't know
Total Votes: 2275
11
posted on
06/10/2003 3:12:33 PM PDT
by
ChefKeith
(NASCAR...everything else is just a game!)
To: Eaker
Eaker wrote
Why would one go to the trouble of voting, "I don't know???
*********************
Maybe they don't have enough to do?
12
posted on
06/10/2003 3:13:48 PM PDT
by
tiamat
("Just a Bronze-Age Gal, Trapped in a Techno World!")
To: AStack75
Now that Freepers voted its no longer a scientifically valid poll.
13
posted on
06/10/2003 3:22:52 PM PDT
by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: AStack75
Why arm the pilots? They are too busy flying the plane. Arm the passengers!
To: tiamat
Maybe they don't have enough to do?;>)
Even when I don't have enough to do, I don't vote in polls in which I have no opinion!
Eaker
15
posted on
06/10/2003 3:40:21 PM PDT
by
Eaker
(Adiós reality; I want to be a Jack-Ass millionaire!!............;<)
To: ChefKeith
Before voting at all I would like to know.
Training given to pilot, a competency standard to be obtained .
Ammo to be of a correct type for inside of an Aircraft.
Protocol on use of said firearm, i.e. to defend the flight deck or to leave the flight deck and attempt to intervene in respect of the incident.
My understanding in the US a lot of pilots are ex military and should have firearms skills or at the least the aptitude to learn them.
On the other hand I recall a case in the US recently of a couple of pilots who where under the influence. Would I feel comfortable with those two being armed?
So sorry all but without a little more info, the Yes / No debate to my mind at least is not as simple as that.
16
posted on
06/10/2003 3:42:23 PM PDT
by
KiaKaha
To: KiaKaha
On the other hand I recall a case in the US recently of a couple of pilots who where under the influence. Would I feel comfortable with those two being armed? Were they flying the plane? Kind of a moot point.
17
posted on
06/10/2003 3:55:29 PM PDT
by
hattend
To: hattend
They were caught before they had entered the flight-deck, my understanding is they would have "flying the plane" if they had not be caught. Not a moot point at all.
18
posted on
06/10/2003 4:10:43 PM PDT
by
KiaKaha
To: KiaKaha
I am of the firm opinion that flying an aircraft requires a lot more judgment and decision skills than does pointing a firearm at the dude breaking down the door to the flight deck.
What's the problem? You don't question his flying skills. Why would you question his ability to point a gun in the right direction at the right time.
BTW, in spite of what the anti-gun liberal idiots say, any hand gun ammo is safe to use in an airplane.
19
posted on
06/10/2003 4:31:27 PM PDT
by
CPOSharky
(Laws do not prevent crime, laws only punish behavior (if they are enforced).)
To: KiaKaha
Not a moot point at all. Sure it is...they can kill you with the plane just as if they had a gun in their hand.
You think there is a chance of rampant flight rage on the flight deck? The pilot is going to come rushing out of the cockpit, start popping passengers?
Where's the rolling eyes emoticon?
20
posted on
06/10/2003 4:44:28 PM PDT
by
hattend
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson