I haven't made any baseless charges, nor have I chopped up your comments. I'm merely mentioned one mistake you made, that was definitely a contradiction on your part. Now suddenly, you've decided to change your mind and restart the debate. In fact, unlike you I didn't repost everything you had to say, in your "tit for tat" style. I can respond in an extemporaneous fashion. I don't need to repost every word you said. And most FReepers can follow the debate, if they choose to.
Besides, you lost the debate. IMO anyway. You're entire position, says that Israel is 100% correct and the Pali's are 100% wrong. That's irrational and illogical thinking.
As for your spelling error, its no big deal. Stop being so thin skinned. Laugh it off.
There is a question that neither you or Churchillbuff are able to respond to, to date. If the Palestinians and their proxies stopped perpetrating terrorism on Israeli soil, do you think Israel would continue hostilities toward the Palestinians?
The answer is no and you know it. So don't preach to me about how your arguements are superior. In light of this fact, every other arguement fades away.
Israel could stop responding to terrorism today and not respond again for six months. It wouldn't make a tinker's damn worth of difference. The terrorism would continue.
As long as this is true, why should Israel withhold responses to terrorism.?