Replies

Irreducibly Complex is a MISNOMER, just because we do not know how it was done now, does NOT mean that GODDIDIT, which is what you are saying in ID theory.

Prove the ID'r, and I will allow that it is a scientific theory, but at this point in time, there is NO evidence to support it, NONE, nadda, NOT ANY, until you have found a scientifically verifiable piece of evidence that an ID'r exists, then ID is NONscientific. The WHOLE basis of the theory is an intelligent designer, and until you have SCIENTIFICALLY verifiable evidence that an ID'r does indeed exist, it is NOT a scientific theory.

No matter your irreducibly complex theory, and that is NOT scientific as well, to say that something is irreducibly complex, because you do not know how it was done, is an excuse, NOT science.

53 posted on 06/09/2003 9:38:20 PM PDT by Aric2000 (If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)

"because you do not know how it was done, is an excuse, NOT science."

I've also found it amusing that adherents to evolution just skip by tough questions.

Irreducibly Complex is a MISNOMER, just because we do not know how it was done now, does NOT mean that GODDIDIT, which is what you are saying in ID theory.

Did you EVER study logic?

Just because we do not know does not mean it is impossible that GODDIDIT. Your logic works just as good in both directions therefore it cannot logically be used to discredit one position.