[MEGoody]

"because you do not know how it was done, is an excuse, NOT science."

I've also found it amusing that adherents to evolution just skip by tough questions.

[CobaltBlue]

>>I've also found it amusing that adherents to evolution just skip by tough questions.<<

Irony alert!

Evolutionists, when faced by questions to which they have no answer, say "we don't know yet, but we're trying to find out."

IDers, when faced by these same questions, say "if we can't explain it, it's proof of Intelligent Design."

In terms of scientific content - ID loses.

[Aric2000]

We don't skip them, we are just not afraid to say, "We don't know YET."

Why do creationists have such a hard time with science saying We don't know?

Is there a problem with admitting that we haven't figured it out yet?

[Junior]

I've also found it amusing that adherents to evolution just skip by tough questions.

We may not know the answers to all your questions at the moment. This does not mean that answers will not eventually be forthcoming. And, if history is any indication, the answers will not be of a supernatural nature.