Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(archives - Aug 2000) Schippers Book Bombshell: Clinton Acknowledged Broaddrick Rape
NewsMax ^ | Aug. 2000 | Limbacher

Posted on 06/09/2003 9:49:42 AM PDT by doug from upland

Schippers Book Bombshell: Clinton Acknowledged Broaddrick Rape

Carl Limbacher
Tuesday, Aug. 22, 2000
Order your copy of "Sellout" from NewsMax.com. at a great price cheaper than Amazon.com! CLICK HERE TO ORDER.

Bill Clinton tacitly admitted that he raped Juanita Broaddrick during a conversation with her husband in the mid-1980s, according to an account given to House impeachment investigators by Broaddrick herself, a new book claims.

David Schippers, the former Chicago mob-busting attorney selected by House Judiciary Chairman Henry Hyde to head the Clinton impeachment inquiry two years ago, offers the Clinton rape shocker in "Sellout: The Inside Story of President Clinton's Impeachment."

Schippers was initially recruited by Hyde before the Lewinsky case broke, to conduct the first serious oversight investigation of the Justice Department in twenty years.

In that capacity, he uncovered other aspects of Clinton administration corruption that went far beyond the lies and obstruction in the Monica Lewinsky and Paula Jones cases. But when Starr sent over an impeachment report that focused exclusively on Sexgate, the constraints of time and the timidity of the GOP leadership left Schippers little choice but to make that the focus of the House impeachment probe.

The longtime Democrat who twice voted for Clinton hired two trusted investigators he knew from his days working with Chicago law enforcement. Seeking to build a case against Clinton that went beyond his lies and obstruction in the Lewinsky case, Schippers sent Diana Woznicki and John Kocoras to Arkansas in search of other Jane Does who had been pressured to deny a sexual relationship with Clinton.

"Within a day or two," Schippers writes, "Diana reported to me about a woman in Arkansas, Juanita Broaddrick, who alleged that Clinton had raped her years earlier."

Schippers' first instinct was to ignore the unconfirmed rumors. It was to him "a shocking story, but nothing in itself that would affect our case in the Senate."

Then Woznicki dropped a bombshell on her boss.

"Oh, one more thing that I picked up. She was subpoenaed by Jones lawyers. She filed an affidavit denying everything."

Schippers' reaction? "Bingo! That changed the whole picture." If Broaddrick had been pressured to lie, it would be part of a pattern of obstruction of justice that the Senate couldn't possibly ignore.

Once Schippers discovered that Starr had investigated Broaddrick's charges, he requested any and all information the Office of Independent Counsel had on the case. House probers learned that Broaddrick's charges were corroborated by several witness interviewed by the OIC.

At that point, Kocoras and Woznicki were dispatched again to Arkansas. During a meeting with Broaddrick and her lawyer, the Clinton rape accuser was reluctant to acknowledge the assault. But in a telephone conversation later that day, Broaddrick unburdened herself of the secret she had carried for 20 years.

For an hour and a half, the Arkansas businesswoman described the the terrifying experience to Woznicki, who had worked with rape victims during her days on the Chicago police force. When the two investigators returned to Washington, Woznicki told Schippers, "Juanita fits the pattern of the classic rape victim."

The broad outline of Broaddrick's story has been known ever since the Wall Street Journal published her account on February 19, 1999, seven days after Clinton's impeachment trial ended.

In April 1978 she accepted an invitation from then-state Attorney General Clinton to meet at her hotel's coffee shop while she was in town on business. Clinton persuaded her that it would be better to meet in her room. Once there, he made sexual advances. When Broaddrick resisited, Clinton forced her onto the bed and bit her lip until she submitted to the rape.

But in his book, Schippers reveals a stunning new detail as he recounts Woznicki's version of Broaddrick's story.

"One evening, years before, in 1984 or 1985, Mr. and Mrs. Broaddrick had attended a function in Hot Springs, Arkansas. The couple didn't realize that Clinton was the keynote speaker. When they found out, they returned to their hotel room.

"In the course of the evening, (Juanita's husband) David went down to the bar and found himself standing next to Clinton. Clinton stuck out his hand and said, 'You're with Juanita, aren't you?'

"Broaddrick squeezed Clinton's hand as hard as he was able. He looked Clinton right in the eye and, continuing his grip, said, 'Don't you go near her or near her home; don't you even so much as look at her.'

"Startled, Clinton pulled his hand away and said, 'I didn't know she was with you when that happened.' "

When "that" happened? Clinton wasn't mystified by Mr. Broaddrick's angry demeanor and ominous-sounding words. He accepted the warning without protest and asked for no further explanation. His sanguine reception of Broaddrick's hostile behavior has only one explanation.

Undoubtedly, Clinton knew exactly why Broaddrick was upset about "that."

Certainly David Broaddrick had understood. Without explicitly saying so, the future president of the United States had just acknowledged he was a rapist.

Apart from the Broaddrick case, David Schippers' historic investigation of Bill Clinton uncovered reams of incriminating evidence. But as the no-holds-barred investigator explains in his book:

"A great deal of evidentiary material remains under seal or in the executive protection of the House Judiciary Committee. While I cannot discuss that evidence, except in general terms, I am free to reveal other evidence and testimony that my staff developed independently. ..."

But even under these limitations, the old Chicago hand is able to shed light on areas of Clinton administration corruption yet to be explored by the media.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; rapist; scumbag; sellout; sinkmaster; slimeball; thug; traitor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
Where is Hillary on this? Where are the questions from the press? Hey, Perky Katie, your hero is a rapist scum.
1 posted on 06/09/2003 9:49:43 AM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Bill Clinton tacitly admitted that he raped Juanita Broaddrick during a conversation with her husband in the mid-1980s

Bill Clinton had a husband?!

Doesn't shock me.

2 posted on 06/09/2003 9:50:44 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I think perky likes it rough.
3 posted on 06/09/2003 9:51:59 AM PDT by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
Send in your grammar tip to Carl. :)
4 posted on 06/09/2003 9:52:38 AM PDT by doug from upland (Martha is indicted and the Clintons still walk free.........what a country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dead
Bill Clinton had a husband

Perhaps they meant Juanita's hubby? Don't even know if she was married, but it's my best guess.

5 posted on 06/09/2003 9:57:16 AM PDT by trebb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
But Baba was sooo sympathetic.......thinks her heinous would be president.

We need to keep hammering away at this and not be told that we are clinton haters.

6 posted on 06/09/2003 10:01:59 AM PDT by OldFriend (without the brave, there would be no land of the free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
The interesting angle on this to me, is that Juanita was pressured to sign a false document by the Clinton team at one point. Other women had been also. This could certainly bolster a request for me to sing on to impeachment.

Too bad the Senate didn't have one set of testicals present when the trial was on there. Every member of that Senate should resign in shame.
7 posted on 06/09/2003 10:04:43 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Everyone with eyes to see already knows what Bill and Hillary are. Most Americans simply do not care.

For me, anyway, reading more about these slime is all pain and no gain.
8 posted on 06/09/2003 10:30:00 AM PDT by EternalHope (Boycott everything French forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trebb
Yes, the reference was to Juanita's husband.
9 posted on 06/09/2003 10:36:56 AM PDT by doug from upland (Martha is indicted and the Clintons still walk free.........what a country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Ping
10 posted on 06/09/2003 10:37:38 AM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Dave Schippers has told me and said it in his book that he could not make the case that there was coercion to sign the affidavit. She made the decision to do it because she thought it would end it and she'd never have to come forward. That all changed when the Jones case was reinstated.
11 posted on 06/09/2003 10:38:13 AM PDT by doug from upland (Martha is indicted and the Clintons still walk free.........what a country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope
No, everybody doesn't know. That is why I haven't quit. Susan Estrich claims Bill told her he did not rape Juanita, and she believed him. I want Susan to hear it from Juanita and change her mind. Some RATS have gotten over the Clinton KoolAide train. I am hoping some big ones will jump and we can put an end to her presidential ambitions forever.

The former head of NOW in Los Angeles, Tammy Bruce, was a big, big Hillary supporter. She finally turned on them with avengance on the air one night and was outraged that they had been lying all along. I met her last year and she publicly calls Bill a rapist. These are the kinds of people I hope we can inform.

12 posted on 06/09/2003 10:46:39 AM PDT by doug from upland (Martha is indicted and the Clintons still walk free.........what a country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Question To Bill:

Did you rape her?

Depends on the meaning of "rape"

13 posted on 06/09/2003 10:54:04 AM PDT by JIM O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Thanks for that perspective Doug.
14 posted on 06/09/2003 11:09:16 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (If Martha's indictment is all about lying, what is the lack of a Clinton indictment all about?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Hey, Perky Katie, your hero is a rapist scum.

Little Katie Communist turns awful venomous when her hero is badmouthed. She is a Clinton fart catcher of the first degree.

15 posted on 06/09/2003 11:16:29 AM PDT by cardinal4 (The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
"a sickening new detail about Clinton's attack on Broaddrick"

Any clue as to what this "new detail" is about ...??
16 posted on 06/09/2003 11:24:58 AM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
No, everybody doesn't know. That is why I haven't quit.

I'm glad you haven't quit. Hang in there. Perhaps a few more people like Tammy Bruce can be won over.

However, the evidence against Bill and Hillary is overwhelming, and has been for some time. Piling the mountain higher does not fundamentally change the mountain.

Given the mountain of evidence that is out there, and has been for some time, I still think that the vast majority of people who are WILLING to face up to the truth already have.

17 posted on 06/09/2003 11:27:05 AM PDT by EternalHope (Boycott everything French forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
I think the new detail might have been that he raped her twice in that room. Or, it could have been that he viciously bit her. Or, he could have been that he she thought his thugs were going to come up and take away the body. Or, it could have been that he told her not to worry about getting pregnant because childhood mumps made him sterile.
18 posted on 06/09/2003 11:29:37 AM PDT by doug from upland (Martha is indicted and the Clintons still walk free.........what a country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Questions in need of answers...
19 posted on 06/09/2003 2:12:44 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Questions in need of answers...
20 posted on 06/09/2003 2:12:51 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson