"However, they included the single finger digit that yielded the fingerprint, which Koompin-Williams said was obtained using a chemical lift-off process. No match was found when the DOJ, using its automated system, compared it to fingerprints on file."
"That's not unusual, though, she noted, since many people do not have a full set of fingerprints on file. Those who do include public safety employees and people with criminal records, although in recent years fingerprinting has also become required for people pursuing jobs in teaching, caregiving or similar careers."
Print is lifted
This article says in recent years fingerprinting was done on teachers, etc. My husband was an educator in Calif. from 1961-79 and he said they fingerprinted way back then.
Since Laci was a teacher her fingerprints would have been on file. Since there was no match in the system, these parts didn't belong to Laci.
My opinion is what was mentioned in the article: ".........removed from a medical research facility and improperly disposed of.",
If I am not mistaken there is a big medical research facility at Davis.
Am I correct in thinking that runningbear?
Possible MG is stretching again....
On Laci, seems like your post could be logical on Laci being finger printed, and background to become or work around school children, so I am sure they have her prints on file, NCIC or per employment.