Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary: Right Wingers 'Peverted' Constitution to Impeach Bill
NewsMax.com ^ | 6/08/03 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 06/08/2003 11:21:27 AM PDT by kattracks

In an interview with Barbara Walters to be broadcast tonight, Sen. Hillary Clinton insists that a right wing conspiracy "perverted" the Constitution in a bid to destroy her husband's presidency.

Speaking in the present tense, Mrs. Clinton complained, "I would say that there is a very well financed right wing network of people that was after his presidency from the very beginning. [They] really stopped at nothing, to the point of perverting the Constitution, in order to undermine what he was trying to do for the country."

Discussing Mrs. Clinton's allegation on ABC's "This Week," Ms. Walters sounded uncomfortable with her use of the word "pervert," replacing it in her own account of the Clinton comment. "She thinks the impeachment was the subversion - the subversion of the Constitution."

But seconds later, Washington Post Watergate sleuth Bob Woodward took issue with Mrs. Clinton's "perversion" charge, telling "This Week" host George Stephanopoulos, "That's not true."

"The Constitution makes it very clear that [impeachment is] a political process and the House and the Senate get to say what is an impeachable offense," Woodward explained. "It's not an argument that even legal scholars on her side would adopt."

Still, Ms. Walters suggested that Mrs. Clinton's book takes the scandal issue off the table for any future presidential run.

"At least this book clears up a lot of things that she won't have to face in a campaign," the ABC star volunteered.

Former Clinton spinmeister Stephanopoulos sounded skeptical, telling Walters, "We all can't wait to see what she does clear up."

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:

Clinton Scandals
Sen. Hillary Clinton



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: constitution; impeachment; livinghistory; vrwc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: what's up
And ... he didn't lose his license forever - the judges were so intimidated, they only suspended his license for 5 years, instead of taking his license from him forever.

Also ... The USSC barred x42 from bringing a case before them - FOREVER! That is not a small thing, but it's never mentioned. That's because HE LIED IN A COURT OF LAW!!
61 posted on 06/08/2003 2:51:04 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
" This woman seeing conspiracy all around her. Can you imagine a sitting president with all the paranoia of a Nixon, the power of the IRS, and the scrupples of Stalin?"

We had it from 1992-2000. They just want a chance to finish what they started. God help us all if they ever get it!

62 posted on 06/08/2003 2:52:38 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
"Look for stacks of the book at a union headquarters near you. They want to put "best-selling author" next to her name."

Doesn't Ann Coulter's new book come out in a week or 2? Any bets on which will sell the most copies?

63 posted on 06/08/2003 2:54:31 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
I'll bet on which sells the most copies in the bigghurtt household :)
64 posted on 06/08/2003 2:56:35 PM PDT by bigghurtt (http://freep.bigghurtt.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
Any bets on which will sell the most copies?

Well, it'll be Hillary's, you can count on that.

Now as to the most read book, that's a different question.

65 posted on 06/08/2003 2:59:01 PM PDT by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
Oh I don't think Hillary's will be the better seller. She will probably arrange the purchase of a lot of them herself, and some of her kool-aid drinking fans who thrive on the lies will doubtless purchase it along with her brain dead media shills. I think most of the country just wishes she and her demented, narcissistic husband would just go away. Ann, on the other hand, has a huge following of adoring fan, male and female, who kept her last book at the top of the best seeler list for I don't know how many weeks and who have eagerly anticipated the release of her next one. My money's on Ann, hands down!
66 posted on 06/08/2003 3:04:05 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
What I'm saying is that Hillary will be at the top of the New York Times bestseller list.

Of course, being the New York Times, we can't rely on those numbers and the book will, inexplicably, be classified as non-fiction.

67 posted on 06/08/2003 3:05:44 PM PDT by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
"What I'm saying is that Hillary will be at the top of the New York Times bestseller list."

So was I.

68 posted on 06/08/2003 3:07:16 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Unreal!
69 posted on 06/08/2003 3:07:49 PM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"a very well financed right wing network of people that was after his presidency from the very beginning. [They] really stopped at nothing, to the point of perverting the Constitution, "

Yeah, in Hillary speak the "well financed" Supreme Court "perverted the constitution" when they ruled unanimously that:

"Like every other citizen who properly invokes that jurisdiction, respondent has a right to an orderly disposition of her claims."
CLINTON v. JONES

70 posted on 06/08/2003 3:08:51 PM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
She is refering to a PERVERT and uses this word in slander.
71 posted on 06/08/2003 3:09:09 PM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
I couldn't agree with you more. Hitlery is nuts and a paranoid. She and Bill crave so much attention, it is unbelievable. He is our new Elmer Gantry, and it will always be about the two of them. They don't really care about what happens to the Democratic Party, unless it serves their purpose. How sick do they have to be to finally go away?
72 posted on 06/08/2003 3:13:57 PM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: supercat
"Had the Republicans taken that approach, they probably would have weathered the 1998 elections much much better"

You're absolutely right. That is true with so many issues. It seems the republicans NEVER take the offensive, and never effectively defend themselves and the party against the ceaseless attacks of the RATs when to do so would give them so much of an edge. The RATs cannot win with logic or rational arguments. Why we don't take advantage of that is beyond me.

73 posted on 06/08/2003 3:20:04 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Budge
Ping!
74 posted on 06/08/2003 4:04:42 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
i don't have a tv.

did she explain how vince's body got from the white house to fort marcy park?
75 posted on 06/08/2003 4:05:58 PM PDT by liberalnot (what democrats fear the most is democracy .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
"Also ... The USSC barred x42 from bringing a case before them - FOREVER! That is not a small thing, but it's never mentioned. That's because HE LIED IN A COURT OF LAW!!"

Yep. WJC was fined and had his law license suspended for committing perjury. Perjury is a felony. As far as I'm concerned, WJC is a convicted felon.
76 posted on 06/08/2003 4:06:02 PM PDT by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"[My husband and I] really stopped at nothing, to the point of perverting the Constitution, in order to undermine...the country."

With a few little changes, Hillary! finally speaks the truth!
77 posted on 06/08/2003 4:12:00 PM PDT by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner
Walters Gets the Good Stuff

"Senatuh Cwinton, if you could be a twee, what would you be?"
"Well, I've been called a birch."
"That's cwose, that's vewy cwose."
"What are you talking about?"
"Hiwwawee, would you say the Pwesident was a phiwandewuh?"
"A what?"
"Would you say he  was a wady-kiwwuh?"
"What?"
"Did Biww skwoo awound with pawamouhs?"
"I surrender.  What are you talking about?"
"Thank you and we'w be wight back!"

78 posted on 06/08/2003 4:23:41 PM PDT by gcruse (Superstition is a mind in chains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Ben Hecks
So the toon can't as a lawyer present a case to the USSC?
79 posted on 06/08/2003 7:32:52 PM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday! (Hitlerys Commercial Was On Tonight, Her Audacity Saying Conservatives Perverted The Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!; CyberAnt
"So the toon can't as a lawyer present a case to the USSC?"

I'm not sure - Cyber Ant says not. Even though WJC was fined and had his law license suspended, I suspect that the case was handled in such a way that WJC technically avoided the stigma of being classified as a convicted felon although I tend to think of him as such.
80 posted on 06/08/2003 8:06:53 PM PDT by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson