Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pro-Bush
ping! No surprise, Bush has been very straightforward since the beginning. Either your with US or aginst US.

I hope you are being sarcastic. How is causing Israel to negotiate with terrorists follow that motto? The US and us are against terrorism. The PLO-PA and its brother terrorist groups are not, yet we choose to negotiate with the PLO-PA and treat it as some "friend of freedom." It is not, and all it wants to do is destroy Israel not create a "Palestine" in the "occupied" territories, why? The PLO, which heads the PA, was created in 1964, 3 years before the "occupation" began.

11 posted on 06/08/2003 5:09:18 AM PDT by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: yonif
"An analysis of the American statements and talks with sources in the know with regard to Israel-U.S. relations reveal that Bush and his aides made their intentions very clear to Israel, but that Jerusalem mistakenly assessed the power of the presidential resolve and its timing."

People frequently dismiss what Bush says, much to their later chagrin.

And as for "negotiating" with terrorists, notice that Bush permitted no negotiations from the Palestinians or Israelis over his Road Map. Moreover, Bush first convinced the Palestinians to install Abbas, whom GWB has met with.

Arafat has been left out in the cold, snubbed even by European leaders like Berlusconi.

Abbas can either bring the Palestinians in to a world of peace, or be ousted along with all other Palestinians from Israel, Lebanon, Jordan, and the rest of this mortal world.

15 posted on 06/08/2003 2:34:03 PM PDT by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson