[Fredsterman]

I was just wondering. How many abused, abandoned, AIDs infected, and/or starved children are you wiling to take in?

[MHGinTN]

Are you proposing killing the alive preborn as a means to deal with the social difficulties, or are you just trying to blow smoke with vacuous-brained 'guilt by specious association' comments?

[syriacus]

I was just wondering. How many abused, abandoned, AIDs infected, and/or starved children are you wiling to take in?

How many homeless people are you willing to take in?

If you are willing to take in several of them, should society decide it's okay to kill all the rest who remain homeless?

[teeman8r]

more often than not, they will be taken in and from their ranks they will take more and more in as they see that life is put at a premium.... one might as well add to your list of aborted children, the ugly, the lame, the not-gender-specific, because you set no limits to the killing...

jmt, teeman

[Sonny M]

I was just wondering. How many abused, abandoned, AIDs infected, and/or starved children are you wiling to take in?

Since I do not have a place in my home, I try to do what I can, as we all should. Whether it is doing toys for tots, doing volunteer work, charity work, fund raising, sponsoring, donating both time and money and recruting people to help, etc.

Out of curiosity, I hope your not implying that because these children might be born under poor circumstances, they should be terminated. That logic is very easy to twist, to what if they were born to a loving family, and then became orphaned, with no one to take them in, should they then be terminated?

Peter Singer uses much of the logic in your question to justify extermination of people with disabilities (born or not) and others in horrific circumstances, both born, not born, or even older or elderly.