[GraniteStateConservative]

No, I don't believe the info was bad. I do know that Bush made a statement about uranium sales from Africa which was known to be false for a significant period of time beforehand-- during a state of the union speech, no less. If weapons aren't found and evidence shows that many underlings knew weapons weren't there at the start of the war, then I hold Bush blameless. I blame the underlings who have an agenda-- those who withheld information from the president and stated rumors as absolute fact to the president. Bush's actions are only as good as the information Bush gets which he uses to act.

[weikel]

He didn't lie the s*** got moved to some hole out in the desert about a week before? What was that "looted" nuclear facility for?

[Pan_Yans Wife]

"Bush's actions are only as good as the information Bush gets which he uses to act."

But those who are saying that the President lied, do not mention that often it is the bureaucracy which pushes an agenda in Washington. Haven't President all along, been at the mercy of those who work at his pleasure?

This scenario is familiar. Remember Hillary screeching in the Senate, claiming that Bush knew that 9-11 was going to happen? And Katie Couric, on the Today Show, saying, "What did he know, and when did he know it?" The public remembers the soundbite, and this fuels their distrust of the Bush administration, which admittedly is secretive. And this furthers their interest, when it comes to impeachment. I wonder if WMD and impeachment will be the battle cry, throughout the summer months.

[weikel]

They were making WMD though, there is no other reason for them to have a facility with material radioactive enough to cause widespread radiation sickness in the surrounding area.

Pinging some of our resident scientistians for confirmation( im just an EE student still).