Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Misinterpreting the Pew International Survey (more media bias from USAToday)
Jim Miller on Politics (blog) ^ | June 5, 2003 | Jim Miller

Posted on 06/06/2003 5:41:17 AM PDT by TomB

Misinterpreting the Pew International Survey:  Yesterday's USA Today article

on the Pew Survey of opinions in 20 nations began with this lead paragraph:

As President Bush plunges into Middle East diplomacy, a survey of 20 nations and the Palestinian Authority shows widespread distrust of his leadership, skepticism in the region about his plan for peace and less regard for the United States around the world.
This is, at the very best, misleadingly incomplete.  Suppose a weatherman was reporting temperatures and had the following four daily highs (in Fahrenheit), 83, 75, 48, and 70.  Would you think it a fair summary if the weatherman said that the weather was getting colder?  But that is precisely what USA Today does in the article.   Here is a table with the data for all 20 nations:

Favorable View of US (per cent)
1999- Summer March May
2000 2002 2003 2003

Israel 79
Great Britain 83 75 48 70
Kuwait 63
Canada 71 72 63

Nigeria 46 77 61
Australia 60
Italy 76 70 34 60

South Korea 58 53 46
Germany 78 61 25 45
France 62 63 31 43

Spain 50 14 38
Russia 37 61 28 36
Brazil 56 52 34

Morocco 77 27
Lebanon 35 27
Indonesia 75 61 15

Turkey 52 30 12 15
Pakistan 23 10 13
Jordan 25 1

Palestinian Authority 14 1


If you look at the table, you will find several patterns, with a few interesting exceptions.  In the first two blocks of countries, Israel through Brazil, positive feelings toward the United States fell a bit between 2000 and 2002 in most countries, fell sharply just before the war with Iraq, and have already recovered to near pre-war levels.  In the Muslim countries in the third block, positive feelings collapsed somewhere between 2000 and 2003.  This change in Muslim views is so important that I will analyze it in a separate post, and will limit this discussion to the opinion in the other nations.

The most important pattern that I see is this:  In every single nation for which we have March and May data, the image of the United States improved in that period.  In other words, the trend is in our favor.  Would you have guessed that from reading the lead paragraph I quoted?

Two exceptions in the table are significant.  Views of the United States in Russia now seem to be back to where they were in 2000, after a remarkable rise in 2002.   One wonders if there wasn't some systematic problem in the Russian polling that year.   Nigeria, a country about half Muslim, now has a higher opinion of the United States than it did in 2000.  Since Nigeria is the most populous country in Africa, that probably says something about how we are viewed in the sub-Saharan part of Africa.

The USA Today article was misleading, but other newspapers were simply wrong.  I found the same negative spin in the New York Times, the Seattle PI, and the Washington Post.   The headlines for their three articles were, respectively, "World's View of U.S. Sours After Iraq War, Poll Finds", "Worldwide opinion of U.S. drops since Iraq war, poll finds", and "Arab Hostility Toward U.S. Growing, Poll Finds".  The Seattle PI and New York Times headlines are directly contradicted by the data.  There is no data to support the Washington Post's headline, but, since opinion in every nation for which we do have data is shifting toward the United States, it is likely that opinion is shifting in that direction in Arab countries, too. (If you have seen articles with similar errors in other newspapers, let me know so I can add to this list.)

If you want to do your own analysis, you can download the report from the press release here.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: liberalspin; polls; usfavorableviews
Another example of how hard it is for the left wing media to get away with anything anymore now that websites such as Free Republic and bloggers are around doing their fact-checking for them.

Actually, the interesting point to this story isn't that the USAToday left out important numbers to the poll to skew it in their favor, it is that this study puts the lie to the charge that Bush has "squandered the good feeling from 9-11 in the international community".

These numbers prove that allegation to be, quite simply, wrong.

1 posted on 06/06/2003 5:41:17 AM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TomB
The most important pattern that I see is this: In every single nation for which we have March and May data, the image of the United States improved in that period. In other words, the trend is in our favor. Would you have guessed that from reading the lead paragraph I quoted?

Someone should tell those Pew folks that we don't govern by poll anymore, that was the Clintoon gang.

2 posted on 06/06/2003 7:05:14 AM PDT by Mister Baredog ((They wanted to kill 50,000 of us on 9/11, we will never forget!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomB
The author probably should know that Nigeria is only about HALF Muslim, and that it is witnessing the most rapid surge in Christianity in the WORLD.

In 1999 or 2000, Reinhard Boennke held an evangelical meeting there attended by six million people in one week! (this is the largest "revival" in human history, eclipsing Pope John Paul's largest meetings) and 1.6 MILLION made professions of faith in writing---not just an "altar call." He had more than one million present on one night alone.

3 posted on 06/06/2003 7:20:05 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomB
"while-I'm-here-I-might-as-well-bump" bump
4 posted on 06/07/2003 4:42:04 AM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mister Baredog
Pew! Do I smell something?
5 posted on 06/07/2003 5:01:01 AM PDT by whereasandsoforth (Have a liberal for dinner. Bake at 350 til bubbly. Serve over ice cream to cut the bitterness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TomB
I've seen this poll mentioned in a few news stories and also quoted by the anti-war paleo wing of FR in the past few days. Here is a good discussion of the numbers.
6 posted on 06/08/2003 10:27:41 AM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson