Skip to comments.
Minnesota CCW: City woman takes on state’s new gun law
Bloomington Sun Current ^
| 6/5/03
| Harvey T. Rockwood
Posted on 06/05/2003 1:13:21 PM PDT by jdege
City woman takes on states new gun law
By Harvey T. Rockwood
Sun Newspapers
(Created 6/5/03 8:48:05 AM)
A Bloomington woman is leading a regional charge against the new Minnesota law that allows most people the privilege of carrying a concealed handgun.
The new legislation took effect last week amid controversy between supporters and opponents of the law.
But Kim Stanley of Bloomington said she believes Minnesotans will demand the law be reversed once they learn the dangers it presents.
She is part of a group that will meet next week to plan a rally against the law in Gov. Tim Pawlentys hometown of Eagan. Conceal carry opponents contend Pawlenty signed the measure without weighing its consequences.
Stanley rolled out a petition drive last week aimed at getting the law nullified.
As soon as I heard about it I started this petition, Stanley said. Everybodys signing it. A lot of people dont want this law.
I am a mother afraid for my life and my childrens lives, she said.
Several church groups have already come out against the law and one, Edina Lutheran Church, has filed a lawsuit to get the wording of some sections changed. Stanley said opponents have at least one ally within the administration Public Safety Director Charlie Weaver.
He sees some really bad things in this law, she said.
Stanley said she plans to meet Tuesday, June 10, with members of groups such as the Million Mom March of Minnesota, Southeast Minnesota Alliance for Peacemaking and Citizens for a Safer Minnesota, all groups favoring tighter restrictions on gun ownership. The meeting was tentatively set for 2 p.m. at the office of Citizens for a Safer Minnesota in St. Paul.
She said the group will begin planning an anti-conceal carry rally in Eagan for mid-summer, possibly around July 4.
Its Republican territory and thats Pawlentys hometown, Stanley said. She said the groups are looking for a park suitable for a rally.
The coalition of anti-gun forces also will begin planning a strategy for the next legislative session, Stanley said.
Stanley said shes aware that none of the 34 states that previously approved conceal carry laws have repealed them.
I think thatll be different in this state, she said. They jumped the gun on this and they already know they made a mistake.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: banglist; minnesota; moosescankill; shallissue
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
1
posted on
06/05/2003 1:13:22 PM PDT
by
jdege
To: *bang_list; **Minnesota
Bang!
2
posted on
06/05/2003 1:13:47 PM PDT
by
jdege
To: jdege
It works here in Michigan. Just the other day, a masked knife wielding guy tried to rob a gas station here near Detroit. The attendant drew his gun and the robber backed off.
The caught the whole incident on the security camera.
3
posted on
06/05/2003 1:17:01 PM PDT
by
Portnoy
(No complaints here....as long as I'm fly fishing.)
"She said the groups are looking for a park suitable for a rally." Might we suggest Massachusetts, Maryland or California?!?
4
posted on
06/05/2003 1:17:37 PM PDT
by
BFM
(Clinton IS a rapist)
To: jdege
What were the existing laws before the conceal carry? Were they like the ones in other states that make you carry it in the open?
5
posted on
06/05/2003 1:17:39 PM PDT
by
thewah
To: jdege
I am a mother afraid for my life and my childrens lives, she said. THEN CARRY A GUN LADY !!!
6
posted on
06/05/2003 1:18:54 PM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
To: jdege
i was thinking I should get a CCW just because I can (you don't actually have to carry one just cause you have one right?) sounds like I should decide quickly tho, the chickens are sqauking quite loudly it seems.
(and yes I do know that 'just because I can' is a pretty dumb reason)
7
posted on
06/05/2003 1:19:33 PM PDT
by
tickles
To: Portnoy
The meeting was tentatively set for 2 p.m. at the office of Citizens for a Safer Minnesota in St. Paul.
Note that they have offices. And paid staff. And hundreds of thousands of dollars in grants from outstate antigun organizations. And a budget that's ten times that of MNCCRN. And less than 100 active members.
Yet they're the "grass-roots" organization, and we're the paid tools of the evil gun industry.
Odd, that.
8
posted on
06/05/2003 1:20:12 PM PDT
by
jdege
To: thewah
What were the existing laws before the conceal carry? Were they like the ones in other states that make you carry it in the open?I believe that they were "may" issue. Perhaps many CCW carry people anyway. This womyn is obsurd!
9
posted on
06/05/2003 1:22:01 PM PDT
by
Traffic_Can
("The future, Winston, is a boot smashing the face of humanity, forever" G. Orwell)
To: jdege
Im so glad I dont live in MN. What's the big deal B!t@H. (in my best cartman voice)
Why dont these morons study what happens in other states that have ccp.
10
posted on
06/05/2003 1:22:47 PM PDT
by
ezo4
To: thewah
Nope. Minnesota law was that if your sheriff or police chief gave you a permit, you could carry according to whatever limits the sheriff or police chief put on the license.
If your chief issued a permit to a security guard that allowed carry only while on duty and in uniform, that might mandate open carry. But absent such a requirement, you could carry open or concealed as you chose.
There's never been a distinction in Minnesota law.
Also, there was no provision for owners to forbid carry on their property.
11
posted on
06/05/2003 1:23:52 PM PDT
by
jdege
To: Centurion2000
She is most likely the last person you want carrying. Based on articals I've read she is "projecting". She doesn't trust herself with a firearm so other people shouldn't have them. Typical of the anti's.
To: jdege
The bottom line? "I'm afraid and I'll feel much better if I can take honest people's guns away from them, whether it will actually help or not." That, in a nutshell, is the motivation that fuels the MMM.
To: tickles
Get it. You may well find a day when you need to and can't wait 45 or so days to be legal.
14
posted on
06/05/2003 1:25:40 PM PDT
by
helper
To: helper
Yep. There's a 30-day max wait, under the new law, but that can still be too long.
15
posted on
06/05/2003 1:26:58 PM PDT
by
jdege
To: BFM
"She said the groups are looking for a park suitable for a rally." Might we suggest Massachusetts, Maryland or California?!?
There's a nice one available in Kabul....
16
posted on
06/05/2003 1:27:06 PM PDT
by
Aeronaut
("The wicked are always surprised to find ability in the good.")
To: jdege
Edina Lutheran Church, has filed a lawsuit to get the wording of some sections changedSo judges can rewrite the wording of a law in Minn? What kind of drugs are these people on?
To: jdege
What ever happened to them losing the name 'Citizens for a Safer Minnesota'?
I thought they couldn't use it anymore.
To: jdege
I give you Kim Stanley, hyper-emotional bliss-ninny and all around twit.
To: jdege
i pity the fools who throw some firecrackers in that park... the mad moms will charge them with firing their guns in public... and then they will rush the "gunman" and beat him to a pulp and say they saved the day...
i cannot wait for maryland to join the states able to carry...
teeman8r
20
posted on
06/05/2003 1:37:19 PM PDT
by
teeman8r
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson