Skip to comments.
Weapons Of Mass Stupidity - (Or only stupid people watch FoxNews - Barf)
Creative Loafing (Charlotte) ^
| June 4, 2003
| HAL CROWTHER
Posted on 06/04/2003 8:48:29 PM PDT by TaxRelief
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-197 next last
To: Fawnn
Tell me about your thoughts about God and how he drives this incessent democratic government within America to kill our individual rights, liberties and dignities under God.
Tell me.
To: MEG33
I agree. We have much to be thankful for!
In fact, right now I'm thankful that I'm free to ignore somebody else on this thread and instead go to bed to grab a couple of hours of sleep -- all the while knowing that my dreams won't be haunted by fears that any sinister forces within my government intend to kill my freedoms. ;)
142
posted on
06/05/2003 1:55:40 AM PDT
by
Fawnn
(I think therefore I'm halfway there....)
To: Fawnn
Amen!
143
posted on
06/05/2003 2:04:18 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: TaxRelief
Oh this is too much! Does this guy realised he insulted most of the brains in the DNC?
"With its red-faced, hyperventilating reactionaries and slapstick abuse of lame "liberal" foils who serve them as crash dummies, Fox News could easily be taken as pure entertainment, even as inspired burlesque of the rightwing menagerie."
That's the problem with ALL liberals. They are ALL crash dummies in the face of truth. Anyone who tries to debate with some should know. And anyone who watches rats should know that only the bravest rats would go up against Shawn Hannity, who BTW, often holds his punches and smooths their ruffled feathers so they come back for more abuse.
And further, I don't think that Lautenburg, Sydney Bloomenthal, and all the other rats who were interviewed by Shawn would appreciate being called 'crash dummies' by a fellow liberal.
To: Reagan Man
A barf alert might have been in order, I agree with you that much. But at the same time, I'm glad to see how desperate the leftist propaganda is getting. This liberal is so desperate that he called every liberal guest there a 'crash dummy'. How does that make them feel? Many a distinguished liberal has gone to FoxNews. And I imagine that Colmes is not feeling very appreciated these days by his own side.
To: Reagan Man; TaxRelief
Cool! Post 'em. Thanks in advance! Grow up.
What is your major malfunction, sport? You stated that there were better articles and I encouraged you to share them. For this you toss out vitriol?
If there's any part in this exchange that's got some growing up to do, I'd say it's the one staring back at you in your mirror.
Look, conservatives understand that the left is desperate.
Yes, because we get to see it in articles like TaxRelief posted.
You may find crap like this interesting and enlightening. For me, its neither interesting or enlightening. Its garbage!
And again I reiterate: NO ONE IS FORCING YOU TO READ THEM, SPORT!
The fact you're spending so much of your time defending this article, makes me wonder what your politics really are.
What...I differ with your opinion and suddenly my entire political philosophy is called into question? Get a grip, sport. Try going through my posts in the forums. Had you even bothered, you wouldn't have ventured into making such a patently asinine remark.
This is a conservative website and should not be used to spread the liberal agenda.
Making fun of the Left is now "spreading the liberal agenda"? Oh dear Lord, you need to chill out.
Unless of course, you're a liberal. If thats the case, in the future I'd take your liberalism to a more appropriate venue. Like DU.
Be my guest. If anyone's acting like a rabid Leftist who can't stand a common sense view on the matter, it's you.
-Jay
146
posted on
06/05/2003 3:05:43 AM PDT
by
Jay D. Dyson
(Liberty * Liberalism = Constant)
To: Reagan Man; TaxRelief
As an aside, since you seem to think JimRob doesn't approve of threads such as this, perhaps you'd care to have a look at an another thread (posted a few days ago) which gave much detail of Leftist desperation.
You'll find the thread here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/918634/posts Note the person who posted it.
You're welcome.
-Jay
147
posted on
06/05/2003 3:26:06 AM PDT
by
Jay D. Dyson
(Liberty * Liberalism = Constant)
To: Jay D. Dyson
Thanks for the link....The left is nuts!
148
posted on
06/05/2003 3:56:12 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: gcruse
So it can be ridiculed or "fisked"?
149
posted on
06/05/2003 4:01:40 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: Jay D. Dyson
From the article:
I believe it has, and I believe that the split between liberal or conservative, Democrat or Republican is inconsequential compared to the real fracture line, between Americans who try to think clearly and those who will not or cannot. What hope, a cynical friend teased me, for a country where 70 percent believe in angels, 60 percent believe in literal, biblical, blazing Armageddon, and more than half reject Charles Darwin? He didn't need to add that creationistsAh! Satan's favorite trick. Tell 'em they're stupid if they believe in God. (It's the old "only the subintelligent masses believe in God," trick.) Wouldn't Crowther be surprised if he saw the IQ test results of Conservatives, as a whole?
To: MEG33
Thanks for the link....The [far]left is nuts!You have an excellent point. There is definite something mentally disjointed in an individual who can ramble on so long with rhetoric that is so deeply embedded with loathing. He is blinded by his disgust and doesn't realize, apparently, that he is being completely sidelined by some deep-seated prejudices. My guess: he has serious issues and needs long term therapy.
To: TaxRelief
I have never understood them!
152
posted on
06/05/2003 4:44:04 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: MEG33
You know, there is one other very good reason to post this article: Rupert Murdoch is worthy of a good Freeper defense!
153
posted on
06/05/2003 5:00:38 AM PDT
by
TaxRelief
(Who says the big guys don't visit FreeRepublic?)
To: TaxRelief
I am eternally grateful for the voice of Brit Hume.
154
posted on
06/05/2003 5:04:23 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: dark_lord
It is all part of a coherent plan.... The goal will be to sue out of existance forums like this one.Add to their plan: legislation restricting talk radio, GLAAD organized pressure of any advertisers in conservative forums or papers, union activities targeting forums, paid DUers, more legislation restricting use of no-public schools, more erosion of personal property rights, more power to Dept of Social Services or Child protective Services, and on and on.
Do they have a war room somewhere with a strategy plan posted? LOL
To: hole_n_one
Egads he loos like another mean spirited liberal..Paul Krugman.
To: Buckeroo
must I beg for proof about your indignant post?
Certainly not.
how many American soldiers are spinkled around the world: 104,140 out of 230,484 active duty military as of Sept. 2002. If you like, bump that number up another 100,000 for recent deployments to Iraq, even though many probably went there from an overseas station.
to save America as a result of national security lies: For the sake of argument, let's assume every soldier stationed overseas is a result of national security lies. It's a false premise, but very libertarian.
I will wager the number is many times over any immigration issue.
Estimated illegal population in US: 7.0 million in January 2000.
Nonimmigrants admitted in FY 2000 under tempororary workers visa programs: 543,950, plus Spouses and children: 672,943 (Table 37)
Nonimmigrants admitted as temporary workers, exchange visitors, and intracompany transferees in FY 2000: 1,234,112 (Table 38)
I wasn't angry when I wrote my post to you, so it wasn't meant to be interpreted as indignant. I do think many of your posts reflect a cynicism that is expressed through overstatement, rather than reflecting a reasoned critique. You may also find this interesting: Instances of Use of United States Armed Forces Abroad, 1798-1999
To: TaxRelief
I love watching leftist meltdowns.
To: TaxRelief
...nor the 1973 film Network, Paddy Chayefsky's corrosive satire of TV news...Basic Factchecking 101: Network was released in 1976. So, if this dude can't get the simple facts right...
159
posted on
06/05/2003 7:33:41 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(I"m not always cranky.)
To: Texas_Jarhead
.
I saw this interview and I was thoroughly disgusted by the kid's gushing anti-Americanism. O'Reilly took him to task but all the punk could repeat was Zinn/Chomksy propoganda. He really was a piece of trash. I couldn't have said it better myself. Thank you.
160
posted on
06/05/2003 8:27:23 AM PDT
by
zip
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-197 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson