Skip to comments.
Decapitating Congress-What would happen if a substantial number of Congressmen were killed?
Wall ST Journal ^
| June 4, 2003
Posted on 06/04/2003 5:03:59 AM PDT by SJackson
Edited on 04/22/2004 11:49:03 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
America's Founders were remarkably prescient about many things. But who can blame them for not anticipating a hijacked airplane diving at the U.S. Capitol?
That understandable oversight is why, in the wake of September 11, a bipartisan commission has been exploring how to ensure the continuity of government in case of another terrorist attack on Washington. Its objective is to help prepare for an orderly and legitimate transfer of government. The commission's first report -- on Congress -- will be released today. Reports on the Presidency and Supreme Court will follow.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: continuityofgovtcomm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
1
posted on
06/04/2003 5:04:00 AM PDT
by
SJackson
To: SJackson
1. See the Clancy novel.
2. We'd finally have a chance at term limits and ridding ourselves of the professional political ruling class.
2
posted on
06/04/2003 5:08:17 AM PDT
by
banjo joe
To: SJackson
The citizen-statesman concept might be reborn.
3
posted on
06/04/2003 5:09:01 AM PDT
by
banjo joe
To: SJackson
Decapitating Congress-What would happen if a substantial number of Congressmen were killed?Is this a variation of the old lawyer joke?
To: PBRSTREETGANG
No comment on the pilot fish working in DC for life.
To: SJackson
What would happen if a substantial number of Congressmen were killed? Freedom?
6
posted on
06/04/2003 5:16:28 AM PDT
by
chance33_98
(www.hannahmore.com -- Shepherd Of Salisbury Plain is online, more to come! (my website))
To: PBRSTREETGANG
The answer to this question is simply----who would notice?
All we have now is grandstanding by the democrats, so this would probably be a nice change.
7
posted on
06/04/2003 5:16:34 AM PDT
by
Stormyta
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: banjo joe
We'd finally have a chance at term limits and ridding ourselves of the professional political ruling class.
The shadow government takes complete control under FEMA regulations and the pretense of a Republic is over.
9
posted on
06/04/2003 5:28:14 AM PDT
by
steve50
To: SJackson
Decapitating Congress-What would happen if a substantial number of Congressmen were killed? Beyond the initial celebration?
10
posted on
06/04/2003 5:30:11 AM PDT
by
tdadams
To: PBRSTREETGANG
Is this a variation of the old lawyer joke? Lets see if it plays....
16 dead Congressman are driving thru the back roads of Georgia when they happen upon a farmer and his beautiful daughter...
Four dead Congressmen are sitting in a bar when in walks a redneck....
There's 7 dead congressmen in a lifeboat with Marilyn Monroe....
29 dead congressmen join the Foreign Legion and are posted in a far away camp. Their only transport is an old camel named Hillary....
.... It could work....
11
posted on
06/04/2003 5:32:04 AM PDT
by
theDentist
(So. This is Virginia.... where are all the virgins?)
To: SJackson
"The commission wants to keep the amendment simple (see proposed text nearby), so Congress has flexibility to make and amend the rules."No, that is precisely what not to do. A Constitutional amendment regarding the makeup of our government needs to be absoutely cast in stone so that when it is needed, there is no political monkey business or wrangling amongst the parties to wrest control.
It's when they make it ambiguous and open to interpretation that the Democrats are able to bend it to their liking.
12
posted on
06/04/2003 5:35:04 AM PDT
by
SW6906
To: SW6906
The states can handle things until congress can be re- appointed by state governments and then elected by voters. We don't need any more authority going to DC, they're power crazy enough as is.
13
posted on
06/04/2003 5:46:12 AM PDT
by
steve50
To: steve50
I would have the proposed amendment require the governors to appoint new members with the consent of the state legislatures. This keeps the decision making as close as possible to the people and places responsibility on officials who are answerable to the voters. The only restriction would be that districts must be represented by men and women of the same political party as they were before the Clancy Apocalypse.
To: SW6906
I agree wholeheartedly - whatever is done, be specific with no wiggle room and no ability for future courts to breath "life" into the document.
Why not provide that, once the defined test is met for "decapitation", the Gov. of each state shall appoint a Rep. (from the same party) who shall serve until an election can be held. Whether that person could run or not is problematic - I suggest not since the appointment itself would be the result of a catastrophic event and the individual should focus on the job at hand and not be running for election - also, it would just give the person appointed a leg up on the competition.
15
posted on
06/04/2003 5:55:41 AM PDT
by
MarkT
To: banjo joe
"The citizen-statesman concept might be reborn."
Wouldn't it be wonderful to return to the original concept?
To: Stormyta
IF THEY WERE DEMOCRATS WHO CARES
To: theDentist
So they find themselves in Hell. Schumer says to Hillary "Oh no, I was afraid of this. Now we will roast in Hell for eternity."
Hillary says, "Yeah, but at least I get to be president."
18
posted on
06/04/2003 6:15:52 AM PDT
by
ko_kyi
Comment #19 Removed by Moderator
To: PBRSTREETGANG
It would be a good start?
20
posted on
06/04/2003 6:30:17 AM PDT
by
Illwind
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson