Skip to comments.
Islamic court pushes back date of stoning death appeal in Nigeria
AZCentral ^
| June 03 2003
| Associated Press
Posted on 06/03/2003 1:52:00 PM PDT by knighthawk
Edited on 05/07/2004 5:21:23 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
KATSINA, Nigeria - An Islamic court in northern Nigeria on Tuesday postponed the appeal of a woman condemned to death by stoning for sex outside marriage.
Shariah Appeals Court registrar Dalhat Abubakar said Amina Lawal's case was being deferred until Aug. 27 as two of the panel's four judges would be unavailable until then.
(Excerpt) Read more at azcentral.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aminalawal; islam; nigeria; sharia; shariah; stoning
To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; Turk2; Squantos; ...
Ping
2
posted on
06/03/2003 1:52:16 PM PDT
by
knighthawk
(Full of power I'm spreading my wings, facing the storm that is gathering near)
To: knighthawk
Those judges should take this extra time to closely inspect their stupid Shariia laws. Time to step into the 21st Century, guys.
3
posted on
06/03/2003 1:55:54 PM PDT
by
EggsAckley
( Midnight at the Oasis)
To: OmeSaara
I suppose you'll tell us that Nigeria is just one more nation that has corrupted the message of Islam.
Sharia is so liberating, yes?
To: knighthawk
So who did she have sex with? Will he stoned with her?
5
posted on
06/03/2003 2:19:56 PM PDT
by
The Brush
To: knighthawk
Officials of Katsina State - one of a dozen in Nigeria's predominantly Muslim north to have adopted strict Islamic law, or Shariah
These "Officials" are just doing their job... just as we have "Officials" presuming the "War on Drugs"... Both groups of "Officials" insist they are working for the public good... Both meet out strict punishment way out of proportion... Both are "Morality Police"... the list could go on and on...
To: knighthawk
Got to be sick people.
7
posted on
06/03/2003 2:30:30 PM PDT
by
BIGZ
To: The Brush
I can't tell, but I saw a while back she wanted to marry the guy.
The second question, no. He won't be convicted.
8
posted on
06/03/2003 2:33:10 PM PDT
by
knighthawk
(Full of power I'm spreading my wings, facing the storm that is gathering near)
To: knighthawk
If I remember this case correctly, the woman states she was raped. But, since Sharia requires multiple male witnesses to this crime for charges to be made, she failed to be able to press her case. Whereas the birth of the child is obvious proof that she had sex with someone.
It's worth noting that Islamic countries often state as proof of their superiority in treating women that they have much less incidence of rape than Western countries do. What they fail to state is that it's almost impossible for a case of rape to be even charged, never mind proven, in their courts. The use of DNA technology is unheard of, although in this case I don't know how relevant that is because I don't remember if the father denies paternity or not.
9
posted on
06/03/2003 2:34:58 PM PDT
by
RonF
To: RonF; The Brush
10
posted on
06/03/2003 2:41:21 PM PDT
by
knighthawk
(Full of power I'm spreading my wings, facing the storm that is gathering near)
To: RonF
I'm pro-life but this law is a valid case for abortion.
11
posted on
06/03/2003 2:41:44 PM PDT
by
Lorianne
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson