Skip to comments.
U.S. soldiers taken captive by Iranians
Associated Press ^
| Posted 6/2/2003 9:00 PM
| AP
Posted on 06/03/2003 11:48:44 AM PDT by SunStar
Edited on 04/13/2004 1:40:42 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON (AP)
(Excerpt) Read more at usatoday.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: army; axisofevil; faw; iran; iraq; waronterror
1
posted on
06/03/2003 11:48:47 AM PDT
by
SunStar
To: SunStar
I'm curious if these were Iranian soldiers or civilians. I understand their military is pretty fair like ours. It's their government and their civilians that are whacko.
2
posted on
06/03/2003 11:52:57 AM PDT
by
m1-lightning
(Gephardt's "fortunate millionaires" are the liberal left in Hollywood.)
To: m1-lightning
Their civilians are no more whacko than ours.
To: SunStar
We should go in force when traveling on Shatt al Arab waterway.
4
posted on
06/03/2003 12:17:47 PM PDT
by
demlosers
To: SunStar
There should be hell to pay for this.
To: ItisaReligionofPeace
Their civilians are no more whacko than ours. Okay, to be more specific, "militant" civilians
6
posted on
06/03/2003 12:36:52 PM PDT
by
m1-lightning
(Gephardt's "fortunate millionaires" are the liberal left in Hollywood.)
To: SunStar
Exactly how many times is this story going to be posted?
7
posted on
06/03/2003 12:46:54 PM PDT
by
TheBattman
(Big Brother is closer than you would like to know......)
To: m1-lightning
I'm curious if these were Iranian soldiers or civilians. I understand their military is pretty fair like ours. It's their government and their civilians that are whacko. Would you say Iran is like Turkey?
8
posted on
06/03/2003 1:32:45 PM PDT
by
John123
To: John123
Would you say Iran is like Turkey? No.
I do know that if these Iranians involved in this story were military, then they were just doing their job and this story is misleading one to think Iran is provoking us. It would be much similar to our Coast Guard. I've met members of the Iranian Navy and they're very friendly to Americans as are the Germans, despite both nations having leaders that hate us. If these Iranians in this story were militants, then the story has a whole new meaning.
9
posted on
06/03/2003 1:42:30 PM PDT
by
m1-lightning
(Gephardt's "fortunate millionaires" are the liberal left in Hollywood.)
To: TheBattman
Exactly how many times is this story going to be posted? I searched for the headline prior to posting and came up with nothing.
10
posted on
06/03/2003 2:01:57 PM PDT
by
SunStar
(Democrats piss me off!)
To: SunStar
I guess it's time to R&R. Reload and Re-Deploy. The countdown clock is now under 7 months. Will we end the tyranny in Iran to save the world or not before the countdown clock hits "zero"????????
11
posted on
06/03/2003 2:04:10 PM PDT
by
Beck_isright
(When Senator Byrd landed on an aircraft carrier, the blacks were forced below shoveling coal...)
To: SunStar
Persian Tonkin Gulf incident ??
12
posted on
06/03/2003 2:08:43 PM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
To: SunStar
A little background:
The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition. 2001.
Shatt al Arab
(shät äl ä´räb) (KEY) , tidal river, 120 mi (193 km) long, formed by the confluence of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, flowing SE to the Persian Gulf, forming part of the Iraq-Iran border; the Karun is its chief tributary. The Shatt al Arab flowed through a broad, swampy delta, but the marshland in Iraq was drained in the early 1990s in order to increase government control over the Arab Shiites who lived there. The river supplies fresh water to S Iraq and Kuwait and is navigable for oceangoing vessels as far as Basra, Iraqs chief port. 1
Iraq and Iran have disputed navigation rights on the Shatt al Arab since 1935, when an international commission gave Iraq total control of the Shatt al Arab, leaving Iran with control only of the approaches to Abadan and Khorramshahr, its chief ports, and unable to develop new port facilities in the delta. To preclude Iraqi political pressure and interference with its oil and freight shipments on the Shatt al Arab, Iran built ports on the Persian Gulf to handle foreign trade. Iran and Iraq negotiated territorial agreements over the Shatt al Arab waterway in 1975, but by the end of the decade skirmishes in the area became prevalent. Full-scale war between the two countries broke out in Sept., 1980, leading to eight years of attacks on coastal areas (see Iran-Iraq War). The Shatt al Arab remains a source of conflict, as limited water access and unresolved maritime boundaries in the region persist.
To: m1-lightning
I understand your reply about the Iranians. But I thought the Turkish military actually wanted us to cross the country to enter the Iraqi border preceding Operation Iraqi Freedom. It was the political and civilian resistance that created the ugly situation...
14
posted on
06/03/2003 2:53:43 PM PDT
by
John123
To: SunStar
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson