Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Zealand man building cruise missile in garage, posting details on Net
AFP ^ | Tue, Jun 03, 2003

Posted on 06/03/2003 11:03:15 AM PDT by presidio9

New Zealand home handyman is building a do-it-yourself cruise missile with legal, off-the-shelf equipment and claims he can do it for under 5,000 US dollars.

AFP/NAVY VISUAL NEWS REFERENCE/File Photo

But the activities of Bruce Simpson were Tuesday attracting official interest, particularly as he has now test fired several jet engines.

On his website (www.interestingprojects.com/cruisemissile) Simpson says he was challenged by US military experts over his claim the missile could easily be built.

"So, in order to prove my case, I decided to put my money where my mouth is and build a cruise missile in my own garage, on a budget of just 5,000 US dollars," the 49-year-old Internet developer says.

"Obviously the goal of this website is not to provide terrorists or other nefarious types with the plans for a working cruise missile but to prove the point that nations need to be prepared for this type of sophisticated attack from within their own borders."

He said he managed to acquire most of the parts from the online auction house eBay, including a GPS system purchased for 120 US dollars that "was delivered by international airmail in less than a week and passed through customs without any problems."

The initial procurement is so far the only one of 15 stages of development completed in Simpson's missile diary.

Simpson told Radio New Zealand it was a crude missile but it was easy enough to make and he expected to have it flying by the end of the month.

"It's like a small aircraft powered by a jet engine," he said, which could easily reach a chosen destination up to 100 kilometres (62 miles) away, carrying a 10-kilogram (22-pound) payload.

Authorities were reluctant to comment Tuesday but it was clear they were taken an interest in the project.

The Defence Department would not comment but one official told the New Zealand Herald that Simpson's website could be violating the international Missile Technology Control Regime, under which New Zealand has agreed to restrict the availability of missile technology.


TOPICS: Announcements; Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: presidio9
Once the Indians found out what they did they adopted the musket without hesitation.

But I am building no missle.
41 posted on 06/03/2003 2:44:18 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: shaggy eel
Aha, you devil, you.
42 posted on 06/03/2003 3:07:16 PM PDT by stanz (Those who don't believe in evolution should go jump off the flat edge of the Earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: stanz
,,, anyhow, I guess you'll want to place an order for some garage-ware with the great $NZ/US exchange rate that's going? Call me first or last for the hottest prices!
43 posted on 06/03/2003 3:10:42 PM PDT by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: xrp
lol...
44 posted on 06/03/2003 3:14:16 PM PDT by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
I doubt it will fly very fast. Anyone know how fast ours go?
45 posted on 06/03/2003 3:15:50 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Until you define the rational limits on freedom your denial of a belief in "absolute freedom" cannot convey meaning. I have the freedom to own as many box cutters as I please, but my freedom to use them is limited to the cutting of things I own or have express permission to cut. This does not include the throats of stewardesses.

Similarly, my ownership of Stingers harms no one. And I still don't have the freedom to shoot down airplanes.

Question: How many commercial airliners and people have been killed by civillians using box cutters?

What ratio is that compared to the number of people killed and aircraft shot down by civillians owning Stingers?

46 posted on 06/03/2003 3:41:41 PM PDT by Ten Megaton Solution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
The Chinese have a supersonic cruise missile called the "Sunburn", I believe. The typical cruise flies at about Mach 0.8 or 0.85.
47 posted on 06/03/2003 3:42:44 PM PDT by Ten Megaton Solution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Re:"If you showed our founding fathers the surface to air missle that you were building, you might have been burned at the stake. "

Nonsense. During colonial times privately owned crew served weapons (cannon) and private naval vessels were legally held by those wealthy enough to afford the infrastructure and staffing such tools require. The founders understood that government derives it just powers from those concentually assigned to it by the people. If government has the authority to own Stingers, it comes from individual's rights.

Ultimately, all human systems require trusting the individual actor (soldier, cop or citizen) to do anything, even the right thing. Organized systems may have built in checks and balances to see that power tools aren't abused or toyed with foolishly, but ultimately some individual, or small combination of actors, somewhere has to be trusted.

It's hard to find a cheaper, more common, and more energetic material pound for pound than gasoline, and yet instances of its abuse are statistically non-existent. Stingers may sound more awesome and dangerous (even though their warhead is only about as big as a can of beer), but their potential was obviously less than the tactical deployment of a small team with box cutters and basic piloting skills. It seems pretty clear that not only people in uniform are in danger in the War on Terror, and it also seems pretty clear that if we are going to successfully defend ourselves against such threats, we'll need to trust more than just uniformed public servants.

Nations under siege (Israel comes to mind) invariably count on irregular, non-uniformed citizens to be able to respond. If Hamas had airships, you can bet Israelli citizens would likely demand and develop some form of man portable air defense tool. Then again, Israelli's sense of community hasn't been split apart as badly as ours by diversity, multiculturalism, and the "leave things to the professionals" attitude of a culture in decline.

48 posted on 06/03/2003 4:16:31 PM PDT by LibTeeth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Ten Megaton Solution
Thanks!
49 posted on 06/03/2003 4:24:07 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: LibTeeth
Yes, but with gasoline you have to get the fuel air mix right, or use pure oxygen. But if you DO get it right, the KABOOM is truly stupendous. Enough to crack dozens of windows at a major East Coast university (which I'll not name just in there are laws for which the statute of limitations has not run out on) at a great distance from the blast.
50 posted on 06/03/2003 4:41:19 PM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
If, as he said it was, it is a pulse jet engine it is indeed a feasible back yard project. Plans can be purchased from ads in Popular Mechanics.
51 posted on 06/03/2003 5:03:31 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon liberty, it is essential to examine principles - -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: jriemer
Yet New Zealand has strict gun control laws...

,,, and a 365 day hunting season each year.

52 posted on 06/03/2003 5:21:00 PM PDT by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
This guy really does build some interesting stuff - see his other site here.
53 posted on 06/03/2003 6:22:16 PM PDT by Zeppo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
We should find out why we're overpaying for our Tomahawks... well, if this guy can deliver as he promises.
54 posted on 06/03/2003 6:25:05 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
This guy is building a jet/rocket engine? Don't think many will be able to do that.

See, that engine is a buzzbomb - it consists of a dryer vent, a spring, a pipe, and a fuel injector.

My eight-year-old could build one.

search google for V1 Buzzbomb.

55 posted on 06/03/2003 6:43:49 PM PDT by patton (I wish we could all look at the evil of abortion with the pure, honest heart of a child.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: shaggy eel
Ahhh. The old Mouse-That-Roared strategy. Be careful you don't accidently win. Then it's off to the moon for you!
56 posted on 06/03/2003 6:47:43 PM PDT by MalcolmS (Do Not Remove This Tagline Under Penalty Of Law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Ten Megaton Solution
"What ratio is that compared to the number of people killed and aircraft shot down by civillians owning Stingers?"

Let's just say that Stingers are available as box cutters. How many airliners would we lose every day?


57 posted on 06/03/2003 6:57:50 PM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
That sorta makes a model airplane kit look like a booger.
58 posted on 06/03/2003 7:03:06 PM PDT by fightu4it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Nonsense.

Rockets were invented centuries prior by the Chinese, and except for the computer guidance system used to direct the warhead, the concept of a surface-to-air missile or indeed any kind would probably make sense.

It'd be computer technology that would freak them out.
59 posted on 06/03/2003 7:15:00 PM PDT by Skywalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MalcolmS
Be careful you don't accidently win. Then it's off to the moon for you!

,,, Area51? Don't think so; not for this boy.

60 posted on 06/03/2003 7:17:10 PM PDT by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson