[backhoe]

Dave, I first heard about the Blood Trail tale in 1997- think it was the Washington Times that carried the first story I ever saw. I really thought that the media would have to forget their worship of the Clintons and cover it- it had crime, arson, AIDS- plenty of hot button issues.

But once again, they protected their cheap little tin god, and cheapened themselves further by doing so.

Be that as it may, I'll sure use your link & information. We have to keep reminding people of the rot & corruption America endured for 8 sorry years.

[Grampa Dave]

I heard about it in England before the pressitutes here ever admitted there was a problem. Then the Canadian Press tried. The NY Slimes, other fishwraps and ABCNNBCBS ignored the problem and spiked the stories.

[T'wit]

> Dave, I first heard about the Blood Trail tale in 1997

You're a little early. I'm virtually certain the story broke in August, 1998 -- right here in Free Republic -- timed for the arrival of the first copies of Blood Trail fresh from the printer. It was picked up in Canada and in a column by Maggie Gallagher that still poses an intriguing question, and there was a WTimes column soon after too, but I can't recall who wrote it (tip of my tongue, but...)

The story never really got picked up, despite all the labors of the Free Republic Bloodhounds. Clinton was and probably still is immune to exposure of his crimes in the liberal media.