[Sonny M]

That having been said, homicide is a matter of state jurisdiction, and there is thus no constitutional justification for Roe v. Wade.

Roe vs Wade actually violates more constitional provisions and amendments then the "magic" it claims to use as its justification for making abortion a right.

That said, this partial birth abortion ban, is probably going to be the case that will go before the supreme court next year on a challenge, and will be the one thats used to overturn this modernday version of dred scott.

[MHGinTN]

I'm inclined to believe it will be the 'appeal' by Scott Peterson's lawyers to the double homicide conviction and death penalty that will lay bare the insidious wrong of the Roe and Doe decisions. But it is not likely that either of our predictions will come to pass ... 'stare decesis' covers the paradoxical asses of the jackasses on the high bench. Even when a 'landmark' case arose from lies and deceit (as Roe did, clearly), the court can ignore the specious to uphold their own error damn near for perpituity. Look how long the Dred Scott error stood!