Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mary Cheney ducks out of GOP gay group
Advocate ^ | June 2, 2003 | Advocate

Posted on 06/02/2003 9:04:07 PM PDT by Mister Magoo

Mary Cheney ducks out of GOP gay group Mary Cheney, the lesbian daughter of U.S. vice president Dick Cheney, has resigned from the board of the Republican Unity Coalition slightly more than one year after taking on the largely honorary post with the gay-straight political alliance.

Cheney, who once marketed beer to the gay and lesbian community as an employee of the Coors Brewing Co. of Golden, Colo., has been one of the few key gay rights supporters with close ties to the White House. "Working together, we can expand the Republican Party's outreach to nontraditional Republicans," she said in a statement when she signed on with RUC in April 2002. "We can make sexual orientation a nonissue for the Republican Party, and we can help achieve equality for all gay and lesbian Americans." She made no public statements about her departure, and she did not respond to calls from The Advocate regarding it. In the past she has labored to stay out of the political limelight and to avoid becoming a lightning rod for criticism, pro and con, over gay rights in the contentious GOP.

A source close to the Cheney family said Mary Cheney's resignation from RUC will allow her to pursue business interests in her home state of Colorado, where she lives with her partner, Heather Poe. But some gay activists suggest that there may be more behind the decision, since it comes on the heels of protests from the religious right regarding pro-gay comments by GOP chairman Marc Racicot. "Leaders of the extreme right are demanding that the GOP back away from any association with the gay community," said David Smith, a spokesman for the Human Rights Campaign, a Washington, D.C., gay rights group. "The Right is calling into question what little outreach the party had to gay voters at the crossroads of an election season. While I can't speculate on the reasons for her decision, Mary Cheney's departure definitely comes at an interesting time."

The RUC--which was founded and is chaired by Charles Francis, an openly gay friend of President Bush--also recently announced that David Rockefeller, the 87-year-old scion of the liberal Republican family, would join the group's board.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cheney; coors; gay; homosexual; marcracicot; ruc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: sinkspur
Or from dimwits, as your vote in 2000 attested.

Name calling after only 18 posts? That must be a new record for you sink? Thanks for not disappointing.

21 posted on 06/02/2003 10:35:05 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
Either way, like for drug addicts, we should offer them help if they seek it.

Most don't.

Homosexuality is not against the law in 37 states; in those where the practice of it is, the laws are not enforced. Drug usage is against the law in every state that I know of.

22 posted on 06/02/2003 10:37:28 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
Name calling after only 18 posts?

Actually, you started it by claiming that Bush accepts votes from incestuals, with no evidence.

I figured one shot was worth another.

23 posted on 06/02/2003 10:39:45 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Homosexuality is not against the law in 37 states; in those where the practice of it is, the laws are not enforced. Drug usage is against the law in every state that I know of.

So what does that have to do with whether they need trestment or not? NOTHING. Both are worthy treatment

24 posted on 06/02/2003 10:40:21 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Actually, you started it by claiming that Bush accepts votes from incestuals, with no evidence.

What evidence is needed more that probability and statistics?

25 posted on 06/02/2003 10:42:02 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
So what does that have to do with whether they need trestment or not? NOTHING. Both are worthy treatment

Drug treatment works; treatment to "cure" gays doesn't.

26 posted on 06/02/2003 10:42:28 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M
...outside of economic issues, what would the difference then be, between the GOP and the democratic party? Abortion and thats it I assume?

The GOP overall supports Guns, vouchers, a sensible environmental policy, support for the military and national security, pro tax reform, respect for religion, pro scouting, pro tort reform, conservative judiciary, pro law and order, pro life, pro individual responsibility,...

27 posted on 06/02/2003 10:42:48 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mister Magoo
After seeing a series of stories in the media lately about gays and the GOP, I'm of the opinion that a lot of people in the media yearn for the old days of the GOP eating their own, and are liking to stir the pot a little and see what might be cooking.
28 posted on 06/02/2003 10:42:56 PM PDT by SoDak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
What evidence is needed more that probability and statistics?

Probability and statistics are not evidence.

Cite the "evidence" that incestuals support Bush.

29 posted on 06/02/2003 10:44:20 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Drug treatment works; treatment to "cure" gays doesn't.

What was that about the dimwit with no evidence?

30 posted on 06/02/2003 10:44:26 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
Cite your evidence of large numbers of gays turning straight.
31 posted on 06/02/2003 10:45:58 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Probability and statistics are not evidence. Cite the "evidence" that incestuals support Bush.

Bunk! Probability and statistics for a population this large is proof enough for even the dimest wit.

32 posted on 06/02/2003 10:47:50 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M
bump
33 posted on 06/02/2003 10:48:01 PM PDT by TLBSHOW (the gift is to see the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Consort
The GOP overall supports Guns, vouchers, a sensible environmental policy, support for the military and national security, pro tax reform, respect for religion, pro scouting, pro tort reform, conservative judiciary, pro law and order, pro life, pro individual responsibility,...

At least 4 if not 5 of the above, would directly conflict with the gay agenda and homosexuals would be strongly opposed to at least most of this in general, yet orientation shouldn't matter?

How does one say pro-scouting, respect for religion and vouchers, support for the military, and then say sexual orientation doesn't matter

34 posted on 06/02/2003 10:49:40 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
Probability and statistics for a population this large is proof enough for even the dimest wit.

So, cite them.

35 posted on 06/02/2003 10:50:46 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I didn't say "large" numbers of gays change you did, it depends on their willingness to change. I understand it's similar to the success rate of curing Schizophrenia.
36 posted on 06/02/2003 10:51:08 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
I didn't say "large" numbers of gays change you did, it depends on their willingness to change. I understand it's similar to the success rate of curing Schizophrenia.

Which is, de minimis.

37 posted on 06/02/2003 10:52:53 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
So, cite them.

If Incestuals are .1% of the voting population then it's likely that Bush got 50,000 votes.

38 posted on 06/02/2003 10:54:30 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Which is, de minimis.

Not to those who want to change, you have no heart.

39 posted on 06/02/2003 10:56:43 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Actually, you started it by claiming that Bush accepts votes from incestuals, with no evidence.

With all due respect, 50 million people voted for Bush, I doubt every single one of them was a solid person. For gods sake, I know people who voted for Nader in 1996, voted for Bush in 2000, and are thinking of voting Nader again, because they can't even tell the difference between the two.

40 posted on 06/02/2003 11:00:08 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson