It assumes because he is a man he is less important to the child's early life. Correct?Good post, Cathryn.
My initial inclination was to think that that distinction (discrimination) might be reasonable.
But, damn, I really don't want to answer your question affirmatively.
I think you turned me around on this one. LOL. ;-)
Wow. Did I really? Cool!
I was hoping you would understand. How would you like to be told that because you are a man (evil!) you aren't as important to your kids? Wouldn't that piss you off, just a bit? Maybe a little? ;-)