Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VRWCmember
Do you seriously believe that?

So, which one of your senators carries around a copy of the constitution? Can you name a congressman or senator that can debate the intricacies of the Federalist Papers?

Which senator was the only one on either side to speak out against the "Patriot Act"?

26 posted on 06/02/2003 12:57:43 PM PDT by FreeInWV (asbestos speedos still on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: FreeInWV
He carries around his copy of the Constitution so he can invoke the "arrest clause" and avoid traffic tickets. ;^)
30 posted on 06/02/2003 1:11:43 PM PDT by Cooter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: FreeInWV
Next time in either DC or his District, go to any address being made by Rep. Charles Taylor R, NC.

Along with the Constitution, he is also remarkably informed of the history of events which occurred in the House Buildings.

Since the Republican Revolution, such CongressPeople have become more common.

Newt Gingrich should come to anyones mind as another CongressCritter who was aware of, and acted in congruence with, the Constitution.

If your CongressCritter isn't what you want, tell him/her/it what you want. You are the boss, remember?
31 posted on 06/02/2003 1:17:40 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon liberty, it is essential to examine principles - -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: FreeInWV
So, which one of your senators carries around a copy of the constitution?

Yes, but he has the "privilege from arrest" clause highlighted for the purpose of avoiding arrest or traffic tickets when he is pulled over for drunk driving. Other than that, he has no use for the constitution. He certainly isn't concerned with whether or not congress has any constitutional authority to spend federal tax dollars for his pork barrel projects in W.VA. He isn't too concerned with the imposition by his fellow dems of a de facto supermajority requirement for confirmation of executive branch appointees, abusing the separation of powers.

37 posted on 06/02/2003 9:01:38 PM PDT by VRWCmember (Stanley Cup - back to Jersey; NBA Title - back to Texas (San Antonio, that is))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson