To: dead
I have read that theory, too. Bush may be letting the cacophany reach it's crescendo before he lays the cards on the table and his cards will contain all aces; proof of Saddam's death, proof of blister agents, proof of nerve agents, proof of biological weapons (maybe even smallpox), and an unxpected wildcard; a nuclear weapons program that was close to producing a working nuke.
26 posted on
06/02/2003 8:13:04 AM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Bush may be letting the cacophany reach it's crescendo before he lays the cards on the table and his cards will contain all aces; proof of Saddam's death, proof of blister agents, proof of nerve agents, proof of biological weapons (maybe even smallpox), and an unxpected wildcard; a nuclear weapons program that was close to producing a working nuke. <SARCASM>
Of course, we all know that this information was planted by the CIA anyway, so what's the difference?
</SARCASM>
Seriously, though, once something is found and independently verified, I expect it will be released unless the information found would compromise another investigation.
44 posted on
06/02/2003 9:53:36 AM PDT by
kevkrom
To: Blood of Tyrants
Bush may be letting the cacophany reach it's crescendo before he lays the cards on the table ...That would seem to imply that all of the denials of these things (no WMD's found, No Saddam, et al) are being done in spite of already having the proof in hand. In other words, he is lying about having the proofs in order to manipulate the american public for his political ends. Is this what you are implying? No different than Clinton, Nixon, etc. if that's the case.
68 posted on
06/02/2003 5:29:51 PM PDT by
templar
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson