To: Canadian Outrage
Yes, if it's the same type of tape, that seems likely. I heard that the cervix was still present. Not sure what, if anything, I heard about the uterus. Sorry to be graphic, but how would a cervix still be there, without the rest of the uterus? Maybe the person who made that report about the cervix, meant to say the uterus.
And we still hear of clothes on the body. But when I saw those pictures, it just seemed so hard to visualize there being clothes left--since there didn't appear to be much left but bones. Geez... this is so gruesome.
To: Devil_Anse; All
And we still hear of clothes on the body. But when I saw those pictures, it just seemed so hard to visualize there being clothes left--since there didn't appear to be much left but bones. Geez... this is so gruesome.Did you or anyone catch exactly what Dr. Baden said on Greta tonight about the clothes she had on? I thought he was telling us something we hadn't heard before, (since I thought Laci's body was naked except for the bra) but I couldn't understand what he said.
To: Devil_Anse
....but how would a cervix still be there, without the rest of the uterus?I had a hystorectomy many years ago and my current physician asked me if I had a full hystorectomy or a partial. I told her I thought I had a partial.
She then did the exam and told me I had a full hystorectomy because my cervix was also gone. I said I thought a full hystorectomy meant when they took the ovaries also. She said No! its when the cervix and uterus are removed.
I then asked her the same question as you did, and she said it just is still attached to the pelvic canal.
456 posted on
06/02/2003 10:40:43 PM PDT by
Spunky
(This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson