Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spunky
You did good! Staple a gold star to your forehead!
287 posted on 06/02/2003 5:40:05 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin; Spunky; Jackie-O; runningbear; All
Read section 253 again.

253. In any case not described in Section 250, 251, or 252 in which one person feloniously and intentionally kills another, any acquisition of property, interest, or benefit by the killer as a result of the killing of the decedent shall be treated in accordance with the principles of this part.

Section 251 is the joint tenancy section. It is NOT subject to Section 254 and the final judgment or conviction. Sec. 251 just says if one kills the other he can't take the property. Says nothing of a conviction being necessary, leading me to believe that all joint tenancy assets are effectively frozen until the matter is resolved.

307 posted on 06/02/2003 5:59:42 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson