Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Defense Team Seeking Man Named 'Donnie' as Laci Peterson Murder Suspect
Fox News ^ | June 02, 2003 | Fox News

Posted on 06/02/2003 5:37:27 AM PDT by runningbear

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 601-608 next last
To: An American In Dairyland
I didn't know that they had made a movie out of it. I can see Mary Tyler Moore playing that well.
361 posted on 06/02/2003 6:49:17 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: An American In Dairyland; Neenah
pssstt, I love Wisco!
362 posted on 06/02/2003 6:49:57 PM PDT by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O
I missed the first part but Janie wouldn't be Janie without her major attitude. :)
363 posted on 06/02/2003 6:50:22 PM PDT by An American In Dairyland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

To: fiesti
It doesn't say....

Just this:"This hearing is a civil matter previously filed regarding sealing of initial search warrants."

I am sure reporters will be there, unsure if televised. Check with www.kfbk.com and listen live for updates tomorrow...

364 posted on 06/02/2003 6:51:22 PM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

To: An American In Dairyland
Oh seh had her lips poked out and her chin to her chest with her scowl on... Marcia overpowered her right off the bat, Janie seemed a little intimedated, IMO
365 posted on 06/02/2003 6:53:48 PM PDT by Jackie-O (I enjoyed every minute of it! I don't like her!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: Tapu
actually, this word should be written like this: Tabou!
It's from French an means something like:"don't touch" :-)
366 posted on 06/02/2003 6:54:38 PM PDT by janette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Did Nichole know Donnie? Was he a hanger on with OJ? Such bull!
367 posted on 06/02/2003 6:55:26 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts (I hate all things Clinton !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O
GOOD!! A verbal beating!! LOL
368 posted on 06/02/2003 6:56:12 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
Grandkids just arrived. I'll to BBL.
369 posted on 06/02/2003 6:56:54 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: Neenah
Two minds with but a thought ;-)
370 posted on 06/02/2003 6:57:25 PM PDT by Rusty Roberts (RB and RG have memories like elephants, thankfully for those of us who read but post infrequently)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: Neenah
Two minds with but a thought ;-)
371 posted on 06/02/2003 6:57:25 PM PDT by Rusty Roberts (RB and RG have memories like elephants, thankfully for those of us who read but post infrequently)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O
Janie is so shrill I just turn off the sound when she is on. Women should listen to themselves. Some newcasters are very shrill and hard to listen to.
372 posted on 06/02/2003 6:58:49 PM PDT by joybelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
hummm, didn't shoes come into the OJ thing..

So funny, that Geragos is taking this case and matching like OJ...

BIG MISTAKE!

373 posted on 06/02/2003 7:00:42 PM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
Thanks, though, Spunky for going to the trouble of posting the actual codes.
374 posted on 06/02/2003 7:01:33 PM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: wingnuts'nbolts
LOL.... ;o)
375 posted on 06/02/2003 7:01:59 PM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O
Janie intimidated...that must have been something to see. I like listening to Marcia now more than I did during the OJ trial. She's seems more personable to me now that she's not under all that stress.
376 posted on 06/02/2003 7:04:06 PM PDT by An American In Dairyland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
>>hummm, didn't shoes come into the OJ thing..<<

Yes, they did but somehow I can't picture Laci owning a pair of Bruno Magli's or as OJ referred to them, "ugly-a$$ed shoes.

377 posted on 06/02/2003 7:05:59 PM PDT by An American In Dairyland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Hmmmm, I seem to recall that WhackyJackie said they could take all of Laci's clothes. She also said the police took most of them already, so are we playing semantics about the shoes? Anyway, all items taken were cataloged, and I'm betting that they also video taped as they took the items as they knew exactly who they were dealing with.
378 posted on 06/02/2003 7:06:05 PM PDT by Rusty Roberts (RB and RG have memories like elephants, thankfully for those of us who read but post infrequently)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: All; RGSpincich; Howlin; Jackie-O; runningbear
253.In any case not described in Section 250, 251, or 252 in which one person feloniously and intentionally kills another, any acquisition of property, interest, or benefit by the killer as a result of the killing of the decedent shall be treated in accordance with the principles of this part.

RGSpincich, I read the above section, 253, to mean (any situation that is not covered) in Section 250,251, or 252 shall be treated in accordance with the principles of those sections.

Therefore, I still believe the following section would apply

254. (a) A final judgment of conviction of felonious and intentional killing is conclusive for purposes of this part.(b) In the absence of a final judgment of conviction of felonious and intentional killing, the court may determine by a preponderance of evidence whether the killing was felonious and intentional for purposes of this part. The burden of proof is on the party seeking to establish that the killing was felonious and intentional for the purposes of this part.

Therefore the above part a final judgement does not affect the rights of someone who purchased the property from the killer.

255. This part does not affect the rights of any person who, before rights under this part have been adjudicated, purchases from the killer for value and without notice property which the killer would have acquired except for this part, but the killer is liable for the amount of the proceeds or the value of the property.

IMO since California is a community property state and regardless if Scott killed Laci, half of the property still belongs to him.

What would be the point in not allowing him to sell it now? Laci's half would still go into probate so Scott will not benefit from it no matter if it is sold now or after he is convicted.

In the long run half of the estate is still his.
Are there any California lawyers out there who can interpert the exact meaning of these codes for us?

379 posted on 06/02/2003 7:06:29 PM PDT by Spunky (This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: Rusty Roberts
all items taken were cataloged

And videotaped by the police, so the reports say.

380 posted on 06/02/2003 7:06:53 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 601-608 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson