No, he did not. He faulted the prevalence of how some people use tragedies as a means to win the "lawsuit lottery", whether or not negligence was actually involved.
and specifically indicated that a six figure settlement was too much for this lost boy.
Where do you hallucinate *that* in his posts?
You then claimed that you were being sarcastic
He clearly was -- I "got" it right off, as did several others in this thread, even if you did not.
only to follow that with a reiteration of the same callous thought.
Try to keep up -- he was making a serious point (about litigious society) via the use of sarcasm. They are not mutually exclusive.
I find your lack of empathy so close to this tragedy to be disgraceful.
And I find your belligerent attitude to be way out of line, *especially* your shockingly offensive and disgusting comment that he "may well deserve to" have his child die. Your own conduct on this thread has been orders of magnitude worse than anything he has said or done.
Did you bother to check the date of the statement you quoted before posting your factually vacant reply or were you in prison or a coma the last year and unable to reply earlier? Either way, get a life.