Replies

And I would never wish death on YOUR child. I should have included a sarcasm tag, because I was being sarcastic. My point was, people automatically seek money when a tragedy occurs, instead of maybe family or the church. I have been flamed before but never had harm wished upon one of my kids so a poster can prove a point....

It is clear that you write faster than you read. Assuming that you actually read it the first time, reread my post. I didn't wish harm on anyone's children and I specifically stated that I wished NO harm would come to yours. Also, keep your Freep Mail threats of reporting my post as an abuse on the thread so it is on the record.

About your lost sarcasm tag, if you really intended for your comment to be taken sarcastically you wouldn't have faulted parents of dead children for seeking punitive damages in your rebuttal. Make up your mind. I will now add disingenuous to my previous statement about your post #11 being witless and vulgar.

The point I was trying to make, albeit ineffectivley (sp?) was that the first reaction to a tragedy nowadays is to summon the lawyers. Thats all I was trying to say. I contacted you by freepmail in hopes that it all was misunderstanding. I see now it was a waste of time. My post was taken outof context by you. I perceived your response to me as me deserving to lose one of my kids, just to teach me a lesson, or something. I see now how I took your post out of context. In retrospect I feel we were both a little hasty in our responses.