[cardinal4]

The point I was trying to make, albeit ineffectivley (sp?) was that the first reaction to a tragedy nowadays is to summon the lawyers. Thats all I was trying to say. I contacted you by freepmail in hopes that it all was misunderstanding. I see now it was a waste of time. My post was taken outof context by you. I perceived your response to me as me deserving to lose one of my kids, just to teach me a lesson, or something. I see now how I took your post out of context. In retrospect I feel we were both a little hasty in our responses.

[Ronaldus Magnus]

Post #11:

Its amazing what a six figure settlement will do for grief therapy.....

Then in post #25:

My point was, people automatically seek money when a tragedy occurs, instead of maybe family or the church

I will now reiterate my statement, May you never lose a child and live to regret that witless and vulgar statement, even though you may well deserve to. There was no sarcasm in your first statement based on your second. No "six figure settlement" will be "grief therapy" for any parent who tragically loses a child. You clearly insinuate that grieving parents are motivated by money when there is no talk of litigation in any of the posted articles. How dare you impune such a sinister motivation to this grieving family. I'm certain that they would give up a nine digit settlement in a heart beat to get their child back. I will say again that I hope you are never faced with such a situation, even if you would find a six digit settlement to be more than adequate "grief therapy."