Ambivalence in the Besieged Town of `Run, Rudolph, Run'

NYTimes ^ | 6/1/03 | JEFFREY GETTLEMAN

[MineralMan]

"What is worse...killing babies or killing abortion doctors? Killing babies is "legal" only because 5 old,worthless supreme court "justices" used some twisted constitutional logic to declare that there is a "right" for mommies to hire somebody to kill their babies hidden somewhere in our Constitution. It was NEVER a law passed by even the most liberal legslative body any where in the United States."

Actually, you're quite incorrect. Way before Roe v. Wade hit the SCOTUS, a number of state legislatures had passed laws making abortion legal. Roe v. Wade simply made it impossible for states to have a simple no-abortion policy.

It's good to do some research.

[dmz]

It's good to do some research.
________

what? and get in the way of a well-rehearsed rant?

[wardaddy]

I did not know that...do you have a link explaining that.

I'm not flaming...just curious.

[wardaddy]

Glad to see I'm not the only one skeptical about the Olympic bombing.

[wardaddy]

I've been "exposed" to CI....I knew two. One was a big cheese and is now locked up. The other had been locked up.

Does that make me a racist?

I've known NOI guys too...does that even it out?

[wardaddy]

No honey....you are the reason. You have publicly proclaimed that you have no remorse. 40% of women who have abortions are repeaters.

Why are the AMs protecting someone here who is vocally pro-abortion?

Is being pro-abortion part of the new FR "big tent"?


However, if anyone threatened you then ....my regrets.

I'd just prefer to see you spend more time at NARAL and less here.

[wardaddy]

Actually, you're quite incorrect. Way before Roe v. Wade hit the SCOTUS, a number of state legislatures had passed laws making abortion legal. Roe v. Wade simply made it impossible for states to have a simple no-abortion policy

I must admit...you are right.

[hunter112]

The one thing I found most disgusting about the "news" coverage of the Rudolph capture is that abortion mill nurse, looking like some kind of Rosa Parks style heroine. I guess I despise Rudolph most for making her a liberal saint.

[wardaddy]

Rudolph (if he did it...and in Birmingham...it looks that way) screwed the pooch beyond normal by the secondary timed explosions and if he is a CI operator. The former was wrong by even the most sympathetic subjective reasoning and the latter issue of CI is very problematic.

If G-d decides manana to have lightning hit and destroy all abortion mills nationwide, I won't be crying in my oatmeal.

[marajade]

It was reported...

[Hildy]

First of all I NEVER said I was Pro-Abortion and I dare you to cite one post that contradicts that. Secondly, this is Free Republic, not an anti-abortion forum, that is why the AM's would never delete a post such as mine. This forum is here for the "free flow" of ideas, something you obviously have no respect for. So if what I write offends you so much, DON'T READ WHAT I WRITE.

[wardaddy]

But, you're so "entertaining"....sort of the Susan Estrich of this forum.

So you claim to have had an abortion 25 years ago and to have no remorse...not one bit...in fact as you put it: "I hadn't given it any thought(about what your aborted child would have looked like) until you just asked me"....from your famous Jane Russell thread.

All that and you profess not to be pro-abortion. Are you for outlawing abortion then?

One last thing. Actually I enjoy your acerbic nature...honestly but if you care to weild the sword as much as you do, why do you holler for the AMs so frequently? I would think you of all people could handle the attacks you seem to enjoy provoking.

Yes....I do think being Conservative means being Pro-Life.

[B.O. Plenty]

"...Actually, you're quite incorrect..."...NO I'm not.....my only mistake was to use the word NEVER....

A brief History of Abortion

[Hildy]

I hollered for the AM ONCE...the other time the post was so vile against me, I didn't have to complain, it was taken off without my reporting. Look, don't conservatives always argue that libs look at things through emotion, and that's not the way to do it? Hmm? My point by posting what I did was to say that the argument that women who have abortions will regret it later is not a good one to use. That's all. I'm not going to defend my feelings, or my actions to anyone on this forum. I think abortion should be incredibly hard to get, and parental notification must be mandatory. That's what I think. I don't think it will ever be outlawed, nor do i think it should be completely. If it had been hard to get, I probably would never have gotten pregnant in the first place, if you catch my drift. And that's what I hope for future generations.

[wardaddy]

OK...I got it.