To: sweetliberty
>> Sounds to me like you think the man has no choice. He is ruled by his hormones and therefore cannot make a choice. That is BS. It may not be an easy choice, but if a man wants to avoid responsibility for unwanted children then he needs to make the choice to keep it in his pants. And the best part, it is 100% fool proof.<<
So here is the real test. If the woman committed fraud and just named the man to be the father, should he still be responsible for the child ad infinitem? Even through divorce and wife's remarriage to biological father?
30% of the children are not parented by the father they think they are. Only the women involved can perpetrate that fraud. Who should pay then?
Dk
There are women and men both that are evil and vile (anagrams). We need to take a step back and look at what we are doing. The least effective way of controlling a person is governmental. The most effective is personal.
The circles are expanded, according to the person and each level is progressively less powerful.
Personal
Close ties, family and close friends
Organisations church, cirle of friends, etc.
Local government
Federal Government
International fantasy governments
To: Dark Knight
There are absolutely women who are deceptive, although that is getting to be pretty hard to pull off in this age of DNA testing for paternity. And they are absolutely wrong to deceive, and NO, a man should not have to be responsible for another man's child unless he chooses to be.
74 posted on
05/31/2003 6:40:10 PM PDT by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson