To: Dark Knight
There are absolutely women who are deceptive, although that is getting to be pretty hard to pull off in this age of DNA testing for paternity. And they are absolutely wrong to deceive, and NO, a man should not have to be responsible for another man's child unless he chooses to be.
74 posted on
05/31/2003 6:40:10 PM PDT by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: sweetliberty
Thank you so much for that reply. I have been flamed for even saying things approaching it.
It is a problem. I did not pick 30% out of the blue. A blood test study did. I was shocked. I was even more shocked when I found that most states only allow a challenge to paternity within a certain time period, even if the fraud was committed on the named father.
Immagine a horrendous divorce, wife gets kids and child support and immediately marries or shacks up with the guy she's been cuckholding. Guy discovers that the kids are really her new boyfriend's, just made during their marriage.
Destroyed, shocked, humiliated, and now he finds out that the kids are legally his, because the law says even if you know they are not your children, children concieved during marriage are legally those of the married couple. If you don't make a timely challenge, the psuedo father is humiliated once again.
He gets nothing. He's not the father in manner or deed. The only thing he gets is the title of cuckhold and bill payer. What a prospect?
This is not a good system, not fair, not equitable, and not moral.
That's why some of the good guys are pissed.
Don't ask them for more.
DK
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson