Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pokey78
Something is rotten in Iraq. If Saddam didn't have the WMD's anymore, either they were moved to another country, or destroyed. What reason would they have for hiding the fact that they were destroyed? It doesn't make sense.
They are either in another country or still buried in Iraq, and may never be found.
32 posted on 05/30/2003 6:31:14 PM PDT by ampat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ampat
and the other point to consider, if Saddam had the ability to move this material out of the country at will, why oppose the UN effort, bring war upon yourself, and lose your country and the wealth from all of the oil imports? why do all of that, if all you had to do was move the stuff out or hide it so that no one can find it (as appears to be the case so far), and then tell the UN to come in with as many inspectors as they want. why did Saddam do this? the answer likely lies in the unstated objectives for this war.
39 posted on 05/30/2003 7:44:32 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson