Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Failure of NASA: And A Way Out
SpaceDaily.com ^ | May 30, 2003 | Philip K. Chapman

Posted on 05/30/2003 9:14:07 AM PDT by MikeD

I was in Mission Control when Neil Armstrong announced that the Eagle had landed. The applause was unexpectedly muted as we were all overwhelmed by the significance of the moment. Nobody had any doubt that Tranquility Base was the first step in an expansion into space that would drive human progress for centuries to come. We had of course all seen the 1968 Kubrick/Clarke movie 2001: A Space Odyssey, and the facilities depicted there seemed entirely reasonable. In our lifetimes, we expected to see hotels in orbit, translunar shuttles operated by commercial airlines, and settlements on the Moon. Only the alien monolith was questionable.

None of this has happened.

Despite cutbacks, NASA has spent a total of $450 billion since Apollo 11 (adjusted for inflation to 2003 dollars). That very large sum was more than enough to fund the developments that Wernher von Braun predicted for the end of the 20th Century, but we have not even started on any of them.

If it had been spent wisely, as seed money to stimulate commercial development, we could have established a growing, self-sustaining extraterrestrial enterprise, offering opportunities for thousands of people to live and work off Earth - but the sad truth is that we have less capability in human spaceflight now than in 1970.

(Excerpt) Read more at spacedaily.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Miscellaneous; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: iss; nasa; shuttle; space
I think his solution will never fly (too many politics involved). I like the idea of an advisory committee helping industry take over space management.

As an aside, what exactly have been the big innovations in commercial aviation since NACA was absorbed by NASA? Have there been any besides the 747?

MD

1 posted on 05/30/2003 9:14:07 AM PDT by MikeD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MikeD
The big innovations in commercial aviation have been in engine design and performance: they are quieter, cleaner, and more efficient. Such are the fruits of oligopoly.
2 posted on 05/30/2003 9:17:47 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (California! See how low WE can go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeD
we expected to see hotels in orbit, translunar shuttles operated by commercial airlines, and settlements on the Moon. Only the alien monolith was questionable.

None of this has happened.

So did I.

America will bootstrap her space program when we get a wakeup call; Chinese orbiting the earth ir eveb landing someone on the moon.

Then we'll realise the folly of abandoning close to a 30 year head start in manned space travel.

3 posted on 05/30/2003 9:36:29 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
Can anyone name the 7 astronauts lost in the Shuttle disintegration? Bet not 10% of Americans can name one. Chicoms in space will elicit similiar disinterest. History doesn't repeat itself. The 1960s alarm mixed with excitment over Ruskies in space will not be repeated over ChiComs in space. The attitude will be: let them spend the money for PR stunts.
4 posted on 05/30/2003 9:56:03 AM PDT by DPB101 (Support H.R. 1305 to cut the Federal tax on beer in half)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MikeD
I posted this same article half an hour ago, and I searched first. Just for the record. No match found.
5 posted on 05/30/2003 9:58:41 AM PDT by RightWhale (gazing at shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
Chinese orbiting the earth ir eveb

Ir eveb? It will take way more than ir eveb to pry Americans away from their Playstations and pickup trucks and take an interest in space exploration.

6 posted on 05/30/2003 10:01:00 AM PDT by RightWhale (gazing at shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I know. It's a waste of money. There's nothing out there anyway and we have more pressing needs here on earth. /sarc
7 posted on 05/30/2003 10:05:05 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
I hope you're wrong. But would be not be surprised if the apathy you cite was to asset itself.
8 posted on 05/30/2003 10:06:52 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
Mentioned on another thread there is a way to get the public interested: sex. How much do you estimate the first zero gravity porno film would make?

If they ChiComs were to hint they were going to do that, Hollywood liberals would empty their bank accounts to build a permanent orbiting production facility with live internet video feeds.

9 posted on 05/30/2003 10:16:42 AM PDT by DPB101 (Support H.R. 1305 to cut the Federal tax on beer in half)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
Phil Hendrie discussed this several days ago. The first film would be a huge hit. After that first one, such vicarious thrills would lose their attraction.
10 posted on 05/30/2003 10:26:47 AM PDT by RightWhale (gazing at shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Until the Iraq war, I didn't know Hendrie had a serious side to him. Assumed he was a liberal. He's an excellent speaker. Wish he did have a serious show.
11 posted on 05/30/2003 12:18:47 PM PDT by DPB101 (Support H.R. 1305 to cut the Federal tax on beer in half)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
I've got rights to the domain name!!
12 posted on 05/30/2003 12:21:17 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
Same here. He did an amazing job as a reporter, and I have been hooked ever since. Sorry, Bohannon. Not many comedians can get a chuckle out of me, but Phil does now and then, and the first time that happened my dog looked at me like I might have been suddenly taken ill.
13 posted on 05/30/2003 12:23:56 PM PDT by RightWhale (gazing at shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
Mentioned on another thread there is a way to get the public interested: sex. How much do you estimate the first zero gravity porno film would make?

Read "Stardance" by Robert Silverberg, if you haven't already.

14 posted on 05/30/2003 12:36:18 PM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
The big innovations in commercial aviation have been in engine design and performance: they are quieter, cleaner, and more efficient. Such are the fruits of oligopoly.

OK, so there have been some refinements. Admittedly, passenger capacity is limited by demand and speed is limited by the ban on SSTs. Still, airliners appear to be essentially the same planes as 40 years ago. Maybe it's just my perception.

MD

15 posted on 05/30/2003 2:31:46 PM PDT by MikeD (Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I sorta want to see the Chinese do the ir evab and militarize ir evab...maybe the alarms will sound then.
I wonder if we need the competition tied to a military threat to get are arses in gear?
16 posted on 05/30/2003 3:29:48 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson