"Why, for instance, would a transcriber or anyone else who may have had contact with this amendment to the autopsy, conclude as Dan did, that it could possibly be a noose and make it sound like someone had purposely strangled and stabbed Connor?This really strikes me odd. Why in the world would this information have been an AMENDMENT?
It would seem to me this would have been one of the first things put in an autopsy report.
I'm not clear what the deal is with this amendment, either. Per Geraldo, it is 10 pages long, with text, chart, and an appendix-and I believe he also said included pics (according to my notes that I wrote down yesterday!) Wasn't the initial autopsy report just one page?
At any rate, Geraldo also said the amendment part was just given to attorneys on Monday. The lateness of receiving it, was due to some 'error'; attorneys should have gotten it sooner than Monday apparantly.