Or perhaps you took that as a denigration even though it wasn't. Your claim about ArGee's statement that I responded to in #213 sounded just like statements coming from many homosexual activists and apologists to me and I stated so.
"I do not support gay rights, per se."
You state on your FR homepage that you "don't approve of homosexuality."
That seems to be a pretty broad statement. Which specific aspects of homosexuality do you disapprove of? Which specific aspects do you approve of? You do know that by not approving of (embracing) all aspects of homosexuality, you are considered a "hater" and a "homophobe" by a signifcant portion of the homosexual community, right?
"But to the extent that the equal protection of our laws and Constitution encompass homosexuals, I defend their rights."
So then you'll agree that the "hate crimes" legislation that many in the homosexual community are pushing for is completely unnecessary.
You state on your FR homepage that you "don't approve of homosexuality."
That seems to be a pretty broad statement. Which specific aspects of homosexuality do you disapprove of? Which specific aspects do you approve of? You do know that by not approving of (embracing) all aspects of homosexuality, you are considered a "hater" and a "homophobe" by a signifcant portion of the homosexual community, right?
So, what rights do SADs not have that I have?