[EdReform]

"Argee's claim that I responded to in #180 sounded irrationally conspiratorial to me and I stated so."

Oh, I see. When you said "You are really looking through a delusional and conspiratorial set of lenses. It's almost amuzing", it sounded just like something a homosexual activist or apologist would say. For a moment there, I thought you were toeing the homosexual-agenda party line instead of engaging in "independent thinking". My misunderstanding.

[tdadams]

You're making the same mistake many on here do, probably in a cheap attempt to impugn me. I do not support gay rights, per se. But to the extent that the equal protection of our laws and Constitution encompass homosexuals, I defend their rights.