Skip to comments.
The 'gay' truth: Kevin McCullough on homosexuality dominating American politics
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| Friday, May 30, 2003
| Kevin McCullough
Posted on 05/29/2003 11:42:24 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 361-368 next last
To: fieldmarshaldj
Congratulations! You're a success!
Your overall opinion, undilluted by any kind of specific detail, is exactly what the leftist media culture was going for.
21
posted on
05/30/2003 4:20:22 PM PDT
by
Woahhs
To: Rudder
Prenatal or neonatal exposure to estrogen results in masculinization...Exactly right, it's the presence of androgens or MIS that differentiate the internal ducts and external genitalia. What our "scientist" mysterio doesn't understand is if there is abnormal androgen or MIS production it would affect the gonadal ridges causing ambiguous genitalia and abnormal sex differentiation which has NOTHING to do with the brain (hypothalamus).
To: Remedy
This is one of the most brilliant essays Ive ever read. Can you book mark it for future reference?
To: JohnHuang2
How many canards can this author fit into 15 paragraphs?
24
posted on
05/31/2003 3:43:54 PM PDT
by
tdadams
To: tdadams
Name one
To: Clint N. Suhks
Name one As tdadams continues to demonstrate, he's not interested in the truth around anything homosexual. Sadly, he's most comfortable when folks treat him like a mushroom. That is, keep him in the dark and feed him "manure".
I'm still waiting for a number from tdadmas, a number from 2-63 but he just won't provide it, which re-inforces his obvious bias on this matter.
26
posted on
06/01/2003 2:23:44 PM PDT
by
scripter
To: Houmatt; EdReform; *Homosexual Agenda; GrandMoM; backhoe; pram; Yehuda; saradippity; stage left; ...
Thanks for the pings. I'm trying to catch up with my pings after being gone for a couple of days.
27
posted on
06/01/2003 2:27:38 PM PDT
by
scripter
To: Clint N. Suhks
Maybe you should look up the definition of canard then re-read the article. Repeat as many times as necessary.
28
posted on
06/01/2003 5:17:25 PM PDT
by
tdadams
To: JohnHuang2
Anyone find it odd that the spokesman for the Concerned Women of America is named ROBERT?
29
posted on
06/01/2003 5:19:21 PM PDT
by
Skywalk
To: tdadams; Clint N. Suhks
In other words, you're going to say whatever you want without ever supporting it. That continues to fit your style... apparently to you the ends justify the means.
30
posted on
06/01/2003 7:26:45 PM PDT
by
scripter
To: tdadams
Thats the tdadams we all know and love. I would have been surprised if you actually had a reasoned argument rather than your usual juvenile drive-by slanders. Thanks for not disappointing.
See ya later pipsqueak.
To: scripter
That is, keep him in the dark and feed him "manure". We knew he was full of something, it goes with being a hypocrite Liberaltarian.
To: Skywalk
Anyone find it odd that the spokesman for the Concerned Women of America is named ROBERT?No why? There's lots of female leaders in the Boy Scouts, do you find that "odd" too?
To: Clint N. Suhks
Come on, if you had a white spokesman for the Black Press of America you wouldn't raise an eyebrow?
I didn't say it was wrong, heck I was Co-Pres of the Vietnamese Students Association once upon a time.
34
posted on
06/01/2003 7:56:52 PM PDT
by
Skywalk
To: Skywalk
Well if youre not Vietnamese I wouldnt find it any different than Robert Knight representing CWA. Either way I dont see the concern.
To: Clint N. Suhks
It's not a CONCERN, I was just observing that it's incongruous. Forgive me if I stepped on toes by making a comment.
36
posted on
06/01/2003 8:08:50 PM PDT
by
Skywalk
To: Skywalk
OK
To: scripter
Ever heard the phrase "We hold these truths to be self-evident"?
Some things are, in the words of our Founders, self-evident. Presumably you would make the same denigrations of the Founders as you do of me. Do you read the Constitution and say "prove it", assuming you've read the Consitution at all?
38
posted on
06/02/2003 2:21:13 AM PDT
by
tdadams
To: Clint N. Suhks
I would have been surprised if you actually had a reasoned argument rather than your usual juvenile drive-by slanders. Thanks for not disappointing. See ya later pipsqueak. What a way to lead by example!
39
posted on
06/02/2003 2:22:23 AM PDT
by
tdadams
To: Clint N. Suhks
it goes with being a hypocrite Liberaltarian. I challenge you to demonstrate a single example where I have ever been hypocritical. You can't, so you won't. We already know that.
40
posted on
06/02/2003 2:25:56 AM PDT
by
tdadams
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 361-368 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson